Skip to main content
Find your template →
Menu

Complaining to an Ombudsman: UK Guide to Every Scheme

We're not a law firm — we help you find the right legal support. For advice on your situation, speak to a legal adviser or find a solicitor.

Part ofComplaining to the Ombudsman

Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
If you have raised a problem with a company, landlord, council or public body and got nowhere, an ombudsman may be your next step. Ombudsman schemes exist across most consumer-facing sectors in the UK and offer a free route to have your complaint looked at by someone independent of the organisation you are unhappy with.

At a glance

  • Cost to you: free. Ombudsman schemes are funded by the businesses and organisations they cover, not by complainants — gov.uk/complain-financial-service.
  • Before you can complain: you must normally give the organisation a chance to fix it first, and most schemes require you to wait until it has issued a final response or up to eight weeks has passed.
  • Most common time limit: six months from the organisation's final response (Financial Ombudsman Service; the Legal Ombudsman applies this same six-month limit alongside its own one-year limit), though schemes vary — the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman generally expects a complaint within 12 months of you becoming aware of the problem.
  • Statutory schemes with binding outcomes: the Financial Ombudsman Service (Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Part XVI) can make decisions that become binding on both sides once accepted by the consumer, and the Housing Ombudsman (Localism Act 2011) requires its member landlords to comply with its orders as a condition of scheme membership.
  • Recommendation-based schemes: the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman issue findings and recommendations that organisations are expected to follow, with public reporting where they don't.
  • What an ombudsman cannot do: impose criminal penalties, award damages in the way a court can for every type of loss, or change an organisation's general policy beyond your individual case.
  • After an ombudsman decision: whether you can still go to court depends on the scheme and whether you accepted the decision — check before you accept anything if you think you may want to litigate.

What is an ombudsman?

An ombudsman is an independent person or body set up to investigate complaints between the public and businesses, landlords, or public organisations. An ombudsman sits outside the organisation you are complaining about, so they can take a neutral view of what happened and whether you were treated fairly.

Ombudsman schemes in the UK fall into two broad types. Some are created and backed by statute — the Financial Ombudsman Service under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, the Housing Ombudsman under the Localism Act 2011, and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman under its own founding legislation. Others are industry-approved schemes that a regulator requires or permits businesses in a sector to join, such as the Energy Ombudsman and the Communications Ombudsman schemes approved by Ofgem and Ofcom respectively.

In every case the service is free for you to use, and in every case you are expected to have given the organisation a proper opportunity to resolve the problem first.

The main UK ombudsman schemes

Other approved schemes cover specific sectors not listed above, including property agents (complaining to the Property Ombudsman) and communications providers (complaining to the Communications Ombudsman).

Key steps to complaining to an ombudsman

  1. Complain to the organisation first. Before any ombudsman will look at your case, you need to give the organisation a proper chance to fix it. Put your complaint in writing, keep copies of everything, and ask for a final response. Most schemes expect you to wait up to eight weeks for a reply before you escalate — gov.uk/complain-financial-service confirms this eight-week expectation for financial complaints, and it is the general pattern across schemes.
  2. Work out which ombudsman covers your issue. Using the wrong scheme wastes time, because each ombudsman only has jurisdiction over its own sector. Check the organisation's final response letter — it should name the relevant scheme — or use the list above to identify the right one.
  3. Gather your evidence. Pull together everything that supports your version of events: emails, letters, contracts, bills, photographs, call notes with dates, and the organisation's final response (sometimes called a "deadlock letter"). A clear, dated timeline of what happened makes a real difference to how quickly your complaint can be assessed.
  4. Submit your complaint within the time limit. Time limits vary by scheme — the Financial Ombudsman Service generally requires you to complain within six months of the final response; the Legal Ombudsman (under its scheme rules in force since 1 April 2023) applies two limits together, both of which must be met — one year from the act or omission, or one year from when you should reasonably have realised there was cause for complaint, and separately, within six months of the provider's final response; the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman generally will not look at complaints made more than 12 months after you became aware of the problem. Complete the relevant scheme's complaint form online, by post, or by phone, attach your evidence, and explain clearly what outcome you are seeking.
  5. Engage with the investigation. Once the ombudsman accepts your case, an investigator will typically contact both sides, ask questions, and may propose an informal resolution. If you do not agree with a proposed outcome, most schemes let you ask for a formal, final decision. Respond to requests for information promptly to avoid delays.

What outcomes look like

What an ombudsman can order depends on the scheme, but the typical range includes an apology, correction of a mistake or record, completion of a service the organisation failed to deliver, and compensation for financial loss or for distress and inconvenience.

The Financial Ombudsman Service stands out because its outcomes can become legally binding. Under section 228 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, the ombudsman determines a complaint by reference to what is fair and reasonable in the circumstances, and once a consumer notifies the ombudsman that they accept the final decision, it becomes binding on both the business and the consumer.

The Housing Ombudsman works differently again, but its orders are also binding. Its orders can include compensation — with no fixed upper limit — a repair, a survey, an apology, or a review of a landlord's policy, and its member social landlords are required to comply as a condition of scheme membership. The Localism Act 2011, Part 7, Chapter 6 also created a power for the Secretary of State to make regulations allowing a housing ombudsman scheme's determinations to be enforced through the courts, but that power has not been exercised — in practice, compliance is driven by the landlord's obligations as a member of the scheme and by the Housing Ombudsman's public reporting.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman work differently still: they issue findings and recommendations rather than court-enforceable determinations. Organisations are expected to comply, and non-compliance is typically reported publicly — for the PHSO, this can mean a special report to Parliament — which creates strong reputational pressure even without direct enforcement powers equivalent to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Housing Ombudsman.

No ombudsman scheme can impose a criminal penalty, prosecute anyone, or compel an organisation to change its general policies beyond the specific complaint in front of it.

Going to court instead of, or after, an ombudsman

Using an ombudsman does not always rule out court action, but the interaction between the two routes varies by scheme and by what you do with the decision.

For Financial Ombudsman Service complaints, accepting a final decision is generally treated as full and final settlement, which closes off a related court claim on the same matter. If you reject the decision, you are usually free to pursue the dispute in court instead — though court proceedings carry costs risk that an ombudsman complaint does not, and can take considerably longer.

For other schemes, whether court action remains open depends on the specific rules and on any limitation period running under the Limitation Act 1980 in the background. If you are weighing up an ombudsman complaint against a potential court claim, take that into account before you submit anything, since some limitation periods keep running while an ombudsman investigation is ongoing.

A note on the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

The PHSO is slightly different from most other schemes because of how you reach it. Complaints about UK government departments generally still need to be referred by a Member of Parliament — commonly called the "MP filter" — while complaints about the NHS in England can be made directly, without going through an MP. Details of the current route are set out at gov.uk/government/organisations/the-parliamentary-and-health-service-ombudsman. See our full guide to complaining to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman for the current process.

If there's no ombudsman for your problem

Not every sector has an ombudsman. Where none exists, you may still have options: an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) scheme approved by the relevant regulator, a trade association's own complaints process, or the small claims track of the County Court for a money claim. Citizens Advice and the Money and Pensions Service can help identify the right route for a consumer problem that falls outside the main ombudsman schemes.

This guide provides general information about how ombudsman complaints work in England and Wales. It is a tool to help you understand your options — it is not legal advice and is not a substitute for advice tailored to your specific circumstances. Scheme rules, time limits, and contact details change from time to time, so always check the relevant ombudsman's own website and GOV.UK for the current position before you submit a complaint.

Last reviewed: July 2026 by a non-practising solicitor · Next review due: July 2027 or on scheme rule change.

Common questions

Q Does it cost anything to complain to an ombudsman?
No. Ombudsman services in the UK are free for consumers to use. The schemes are funded by the businesses and organisations they cover, either through statutory levies, membership fees, or a charge per case investigated. You should never be asked to pay an ombudsman to look at your complaint — be cautious of any firm offering to submit it for you for a fee when you can do it yourself directly.
Q How long do I have to complain to an ombudsman?
It depends on the scheme, but six months from the date of the organisation's final response is the most common limit — this applies to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The Legal Ombudsman applies two time limits together, and both must be met: since 1 April 2023 it requires complaints to be referred within one year of the act or omission, or one year from when you should reasonably have realised there was cause for complaint, and separately, within six months of the provider's final response. The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman normally will not look at a complaint made more than 12 months after you became aware of the problem. Always check the specific scheme's own time limit, because missing it usually means your complaint will not be considered.
Q What can an ombudsman actually order an organisation to do?
An ombudsman can typically require an organisation to apologise, correct a mistake, put right a service failure, or pay compensation for financial loss and sometimes for distress and inconvenience. Compensation limits and powers differ by scheme — the Financial Ombudsman Service can make money awards that are legally binding once accepted, under section 228 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, and the Housing Ombudsman's orders are binding on its member landlords, with no fixed upper limit on the compensation it can order. An ombudsman cannot generally impose criminal penalties, prosecute anyone, or force an organisation to change its wider policies beyond your individual case.
Q Is an ombudsman's decision binding?
It depends on the scheme and, for some schemes, on whether you accept the outcome. Under section 228(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, a Financial Ombudsman Service final decision becomes binding on both the business and the consumer once the consumer notifies the ombudsman that they accept it. The Housing Ombudsman's orders are also binding on its member landlords, because membership of the scheme obliges landlords to comply with them. The Localism Act 2011 additionally created a power for the Secretary of State to allow a housing ombudsman's determinations to be enforced through the courts, but that power has not been brought into force, so in practice compliance is driven by the landlord's obligations as a scheme member and by public reporting of non-compliance. Other schemes, including the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, issue recommendations that the organisation is expected to comply with and that are publicly reported on if ignored, rather than court-enforceable determinations in the same way.
Q Can I still go to court after using an ombudsman?
It depends on the scheme and what you do with the decision. With the Financial Ombudsman Service, if you accept a final decision it is treated as full and final settlement, which closes off a related court claim on the same complaint. If you reject the decision, you are generally free to pursue the matter in court instead, though this carries costs risk that a free ombudsman complaint does not. For other schemes, using the ombudsman does not automatically prevent you from pursuing a separate legal claim — check the specific scheme's rules before deciding, and get advice if a court deadline (a limitation period) might be running at the same time.
Q What if there's no ombudsman for my type of complaint?
Not every sector has an ombudsman. Where there isn't one, you may be able to use an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) scheme approved by a regulator, a trade association's own complaints procedure, or the small claims track of the County Court for a money claim. The Money and Pensions Service and Citizens Advice can help point you to the right route for a consumer issue that falls outside the main ombudsman schemes.
Q How long does an ombudsman investigation take?
This varies widely by scheme and by how complex your case is. Straightforward complaints can sometimes be resolved in a few weeks; more involved investigations, particularly ones needing detailed evidence from both sides, can take several months. Schemes generally publish their own average handling times. You can help keep things moving by responding promptly to requests for information and setting out your complaint clearly and in date order from the start.

Sources

This guide is based on primary UK law and official guidance.

Brad Askew, Solicitor (non-practising)

Written & reviewed by

Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)

Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.

Legal disclaimer
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.