Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When a buyer and seller start talking seriously about a share sale, writing down what they have agreed so far is usually the sensible next move. That is what Heads of Terms do. They capture the headline points of the deal, price, timing, conditions, before anyone spends real money on lawyers drafting the full Share Purchase Agreement.
Most of the document is not legally binding, but a few provisions typically are, such as confidentiality and exclusivity. Getting the Heads of Terms right helps both sides stay on the same page, flushes out disagreements early, and reduces the risk of one party walking away halfway through due diligence because something they assumed turns out not to be true.
Overview
Heads of Terms, sometimes called a Term Sheet, Letter of Intent, or Memorandum of Understanding, are a short written summary of the main commercial terms agreed between a buyer and seller of shares in a company. They sit at the front end of the transaction, before detailed drafting begins, and give the parties a shared reference point as negotiations move forward.
For share sales specifically, the document usually sets out who is buying what from whom, the headline price and how it will be paid, any conditions that have to be satisfied before completion, and the scope of warranties and restrictions the seller will accept. It often also deals with how the parties will behave during negotiations: keeping discussions confidential, not talking to other buyers for a fixed period, and who pays their own costs if the deal falls through.
Although most clauses are expressed as non-binding, certain provisions are usually drafted to have legal effect. This mixed status is deliberate and commonly accepted in UK corporate practice.
Key steps
Identify the parties and the shares. Set out the full legal names of the buyer, the seller, and the target company, including company numbers where relevant. Describe exactly which shares are being sold, whether that is the entire issued share capital or a specific percentage, so there is no ambiguity about what the deal actually covers.
Agree the price and payment structure. State the headline consideration and how it will be paid. This might be cash on completion, deferred payments, an earn-out linked to future performance, or a mix. Flag any adjustments to the price that will be calculated closer to completion, such as working capital or net debt adjustments, and note the assumptions behind the figure.
Set out conditions and timetable. List the key conditions that must be met before completion can happen, such as due diligence, board or shareholder approvals, regulatory consents, or third-party agreements. Include a target exchange and completion date so both sides know what they are working towards and can plan resourcing accordingly.
Outline warranties, indemnities and restrictions. Indicate the scope of warranties the seller will give in the full agreement, any expected indemnities for known issues, and any limits on the seller's liability. Also summarise non-compete and non-solicitation restrictions the seller will accept post-completion, along with their duration and geographic scope.
Mark what is binding and what is not. Clearly state that the commercial terms are subject to contract and not legally binding, but identify the clauses that are binding, typically confidentiality, exclusivity, costs, and governing law. This avoids later arguments about whether one side was locked in before the Share Purchase Agreement was signed.
Q Are Heads of Terms legally binding in a share sale?
Usually only in part. The commercial terms, price, warranties, structure, are normally expressed as subject to contract and not binding. However, clauses dealing with confidentiality, exclusivity (sometimes called a lock-out), costs and governing law are typically drafted to be binding from signature. It is important that the document makes this distinction clear on its face, otherwise disputes can arise about what either party has actually committed to.
Q Do I really need Heads of Terms if we trust each other?
Trust is useful but memory is unreliable, especially once lawyers, accountants and funders get involved. Heads of Terms force both sides to articulate what they think they have agreed, which often reveals small but important differences in understanding. They also give advisers a clear brief to work from, which tends to speed up drafting the Share Purchase Agreement and reduces the risk of renegotiation later.
Q What is the difference between Heads of Terms and a Share Purchase Agreement?
Heads of Terms are a short, mostly non-binding summary of the headline commercial points. The Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) is the long-form contract that actually transfers the shares and contains the detailed warranties, indemnities, tax covenant, and completion mechanics. Heads of Terms come first and shape the SPA. The SPA is the document the parties sign and complete against, and it supersedes the Heads once signed.
Q How long should an exclusivity period be?
There is no fixed rule. Sellers tend to prefer shorter periods because they do not want to be locked out of the market for too long, while buyers want enough time to run due diligence and negotiate the SPA. Periods of a few weeks to a few months are common, depending on the complexity of the target. The key is that exclusivity is drafted as a binding obligation with a clear end date.
Q Should the buyer or the seller draft the Heads of Terms?
Whoever drafts first tends to frame the deal, so there can be a tactical advantage. In practice, the buyer often produces the first draft because they are the one wanting exclusivity and controlling the diligence process. The seller then negotiates on price, warranty scope and restrictions. Either way, both sides should take their own advice before signing, even though most of the document is non-binding.
Q Can Heads of Terms be changed later?
Yes, and they often are. As due diligence uncovers issues or the deal evolves, the parties commonly revise the position on price, warranties, or completion conditions. Because the commercial terms are not binding, there is flexibility to adjust them by agreement. That said, significant departures from the Heads can damage trust, so it is worth being realistic about the headline terms when they are first recorded.
Q What happens if the deal falls through after Heads of Terms are signed?
If the non-binding parts are well drafted, neither side can force the other to complete the sale. Each party usually bears its own costs, and any binding obligations, such as confidentiality, typically continue. If exclusivity was breached, the innocent party may have a claim for wasted costs. This is one reason it is worth being clear about which clauses survive termination of negotiations.
The clauses you agree at this stage shape the whole share sale, from price adjustments to what the seller can do afterwards. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through the key terms and pitfalls based on what you describe on the call.
✓A plain-English explanation of what each section typically covers
✓Practical perspective on binding vs non-binding clauses in your situation
✓What to watch out for on price, warranties and exclusivity based on what you describe
✓Clarity on your next steps before moving to a full Share Purchase Agreement
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.