Skip to main content
Book a call — £89
Menu

ATE Insurance UK: Public Law Claims Cover Explained

We're not a law firm — we help you find the right legal support. For advice on your situation, speak to a legal adviser or find a solicitor.

Part ofATE Insurance UK

Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Taking on a public body in court is rarely a fair fight. The state, local authorities and regulatory agencies have deep pockets, in-house legal teams and the patience to see cases through to the end. Private individuals and small organisations usually have none of those advantages. That imbalance is one of the main reasons After-The-Event (ATE) insurance exists. It is a policy you buy once a dispute has already started, and it is designed to cover the financial risks that come with losing, particularly the other side's legal costs. This guide walks through how ATE insurance works in public law claims, which types of cases it typically supports, what it does and does not cover, and the practical points to weigh up before you commit. It is written for claimants, not insurers, so the focus is on what the cover actually does for you.

Overview

ATE insurance is a litigation policy taken out after a legal dispute has already arisen. The clue is in the name: After-The-Event, meaning after the facts giving rise to the claim have occurred. It sits alongside your conduct of the litigation rather than being a general cover you hold in the background.

The core purpose is straightforward. If you lose your case, the losing party in England and Wales is usually ordered to pay a portion of the winning side's legal costs. That adverse costs order can run into tens or even hundreds of thousands of pounds in public law work.

ATE insurance is structured to respond to that liability, and often to your own disbursements too, such as court fees, expert reports and counsel's fees. Unlike Before-The-Event cover bolted onto a household or motor policy, ATE is priced and underwritten around the specific case.

The premium reflects the strength of the claim, the likely costs exposure and the stage at which cover is taken out. In many arrangements the premium is deferred and self-insured, meaning it is only payable if you win.

Key steps

  1. Assess whether ATE is appropriate for your claim. Not every public law matter needs or justifies ATE cover. Weigh up the likely adverse costs exposure, whether costs protection rules already apply (for example in Aarhus Convention environmental claims), and whether the other side is likely to seek costs if you lose. A claim with modest costs risk may not warrant a premium. 2. Gather the case materials an insurer will want to see. Underwriters typically review the pre-action correspondence, grounds of claim, any counsel's opinion on prospects, and an estimate of costs to conclusion. The stronger and more organised the papers, the easier it is to secure cover at a sensible premium. Poorly prepared submissions often get declined or priced heavily. 3. Compare policies and premium structures. ATE products vary significantly. Some offer deferred premiums payable only on success, others require an upfront element. Cover limits, exclusions, and the treatment of own-side disbursements differ between providers. Read the policy schedule carefully and ask about what happens if the case settles early or if you discontinue. 4. Take out cover at the right moment in the case. Timing matters. Premiums are generally cheaper earlier in proceedings because the insurer is taking on less information risk. Leaving it until close to trial can narrow your options and push the premium up. That said, you need enough information about the claim to make a sensible application, so the sweet spot is usually once the grounds and response are clear. 5. Keep your insurer informed as the case develops. Most ATE policies include conditions requiring you to notify material changes: new evidence, settlement offers, Part 36 offers, or shifts in prospects. Failing to keep the insurer updated can put cover at risk. Treat the policy as a live relationship rather than a document you file and forget.
If you're dealing with this kind of situation, a call with an experienced legal adviser can help you work out the right next step — from £89.

Common questions

Q Does ATE insurance cover my own solicitor's fees?
Usually not. ATE is primarily designed to meet adverse costs, meaning the other side's legal bill if you lose. Some policies also cover your own disbursements such as court fees, expert reports and counsel's fees, but your solicitor's profit costs are normally handled separately, often under a Conditional Fee Agreement. Always check the policy wording, as cover varies between providers and products.
Q When should I take out ATE cover in a judicial review?
Most claimants arrange cover once the claim has been issued and the defendant's summary grounds of resistance are known, but before permission is determined. That gives the underwriter enough information to assess prospects while still keeping the premium reasonable. Leaving it until after permission is granted is possible but tends to be more expensive, as the insurer has less room to price risk favourably.
Q What is a costs capping order and how does it interact with ATE?
In judicial review, the court can make a costs capping order (sometimes called a protective costs order in earlier terminology) limiting the amount a claimant may be ordered to pay if they lose. Where a cap is in place, the residual exposure is smaller, which can reduce the ATE premium or make cover unnecessary. The interaction is case-specific and worth discussing before buying a policy.
Q Is the ATE premium recoverable from the losing side?
For most civil claims started after April 2013, ATE premiums are no longer recoverable from the losing defendant. There are limited exceptions, for example certain clinical negligence cases involving expert report costs. In public law claims, you should generally assume the premium is a cost you bear, typically deferred and payable only on success. Check the current position with an adviser familiar with your claim type.
Q Can ATE insurance be refused or cancelled?
Yes. Insurers can decline applications where prospects are weak, the costs exposure is disproportionate to likely damages, or the case falls outside their appetite. Existing policies can also be withdrawn if prospects materially deteriorate or if the policyholder breaches conditions such as notification duties. This is why keeping your insurer informed throughout the case is important rather than optional.
Q Do environmental public law claims need ATE?
Claims falling within the Aarhus Convention regime benefit from default costs caps under the Civil Procedure Rules, which limit the claimant's exposure. Many claimants still take out ATE to cover the capped amount and their own disbursements, but the calculation is different from an unprotected claim. If you think your case is Aarhus-eligible, raise this early, as it affects both cover and premium.
Q Is ATE available for claims against central government?
Yes, ATE is commonly used for judicial reviews and other public law challenges against central government departments, agencies and ministers. The underwriting approach is similar to any other public law claim: the insurer looks at prospects, costs exposure and the realistic path of the litigation. Premiums reflect the fact that government defendants tend to defend robustly and rarely drop out early.
If you're dealing with this kind of situation, a call with an experienced legal adviser can help you work out the right next step — from £89.

Sources

This guide is based on primary UK law and official guidance.

Brad Askew, Solicitor (non-practising)

Written & reviewed by

Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)

Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.

Legal disclaimer
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.