Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Covenants attached to land can quietly shape what you are allowed to do with your own property. Many homeowners only discover these restrictions when they start planning an extension, a change of use, or a sale, and suddenly find an old clause in the title deeds standing in the way.
Disputes over covenants are one of the more technical corners of property law in England and Wales, and they often involve neighbours, developers, or successors in title who may have very different views about what a clause means and whether it is still enforceable. This guide walks through the main types of covenants you might encounter, how they are created, how they can be challenged, and the practical routes available when a disagreement turns into a formal dispute.
Overview
A covenant is a promise written into a property's title that either restricts what an owner can do with the land (a restrictive covenant) or requires them to do something specific (a positive covenant). Restrictive covenants are common in residential estates and older freehold properties, where a developer or previous owner wanted to preserve a particular character, view, or use pattern across a group of plots.
Typical examples include limits on building height, bans on running a business from the property, restrictions on keeping animals, prohibitions on dividing the plot, and requirements to keep shared boundary features in good order. Positive covenants, by contrast, oblige the owner to take action, such as contributing to the upkeep of a private road or maintaining a shared drainage system.
Both types can bind future owners in certain circumstances, which is why they show up so often in property disputes long after the original parties have moved on. When an owner believes a covenant is outdated, unreasonable, or being breached by a neighbour, the matter may need to be resolved through negotiation, insurance, the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), or the courts.
Key steps
Check the title and identify the covenant. Start by obtaining an official copy of the register and title plan from HM Land Registry. The covenant will usually be set out in the Charges Register or referred to in a historic deed. Read it carefully and note who imposed it, when, and who is said to benefit from it. The exact wording matters a great deal, because enforcement often turns on small details of language.
Work out who can enforce it. Not every covenant is enforceable by every neighbour. For restrictive covenants to bind successors, the benefit must have been properly annexed or assigned to neighbouring land, and the burden must run with the land in equity. Positive covenants generally do not bind successors automatically, which can be significant if you are the one being asked to comply.
Consider whether the covenant is still valid. Covenants can become obsolete if the character of the area has changed, if the person entitled to enforce cannot be identified, or if the restriction no longer serves any practical purpose. In some cases, indemnity insurance is available to protect against the risk of a future claim, which can be a pragmatic solution when enforcement looks unlikely but cannot be ruled out entirely.
Try to resolve matters through negotiation. Many covenant disputes are settled without litigation. A frank conversation with the neighbour or beneficiary, sometimes followed by a formal deed of release or variation, can avoid years of cost and stress. Mediation is also worth considering, particularly where the parties will continue to live next to each other.
Apply to modify or discharge the covenant if needed. Under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) has the power to modify or discharge restrictive covenants in defined circumstances, including where they are obsolete or impede reasonable use of the land. Applications are technical and usually benefit from specialist input before they are made.
Q What is the difference between a restrictive and a positive covenant?
A restrictive covenant stops a landowner from doing something, such as building above a certain height or running a business from home. A positive covenant requires the owner to do something active, like contributing to the cost of maintaining a shared driveway. The enforceability rules differ between the two, and positive covenants are generally harder to enforce against successors in title without additional legal mechanisms.
Q Can a restrictive covenant be ignored if it looks very old?
Age alone does not make a covenant unenforceable. Some Victorian-era covenants are still binding today. What matters is whether the benefit passes to a current neighbour, whether the burden runs with the land, and whether the restriction still serves a purpose. Ignoring an old covenant can be risky, because enforcement action or a successful claim for damages may still be possible.
Q What happens if I breach a restrictive covenant?
A person entitled to enforce the covenant may seek an injunction to stop the breach, an order requiring you to undo work already carried out, or damages in place of an injunction. The court considers factors such as delay, the seriousness of the breach, and whether the claimant has acquiesced. Early legal input is sensible if you are accused of a breach or worried about one.
Q Can I get indemnity insurance instead of going to court?
Restrictive covenant indemnity insurance is widely available and often used in property transactions where the risk of enforcement is low but not zero. The policy pays out if a successful claim is later brought. Insurers usually require that no approach has been made to the beneficiary, because contacting them can increase the perceived risk and make cover harder to obtain.
Q How do I apply to have a covenant removed or changed?
An application can be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The grounds include that the covenant is obsolete, impedes reasonable use, has been agreed to be discharged, or causes no injury to anyone entitled to the benefit. The process is formal and evidence-heavy, so most applicants take specialist advice before proceeding.
Q Do positive covenants bind future owners of the property?
The burden of a positive covenant does not automatically pass to a new owner in the same way a restrictive covenant can. Developers often get around this using chains of indemnity, estate rentcharges, or requirements for future buyers to enter into fresh deeds. If you are buying a property with positive covenants, your conveyancer should explain how enforcement is structured.
Q Are easements the same as covenants?
No, although they are often discussed together. An easement is a right over someone else's land, such as a right of way or a right of drainage. A covenant is a promise about how land will or will not be used. Both appear on the title register and both can trigger disputes, but the legal tests for creation, enforcement, and modification are different.
Covenant disputes turn on very specific wording in the title, and the right next step depends entirely on the facts of your situation. An experienced legal adviser can talk through what the covenant appears to mean and your practical options, based on what you describe on the call.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the covenant
✓Practical perspective on your options based on what you describe
✓Help you think through negotiation, insurance, or a tribunal application
✓Clarity on what to watch out for before taking any action
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.