Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Disagreements over repairs are one of the most frequent flashpoints in commercial leasing. When a tenant moves out, or even partway through a lease, questions tend to surface about who should have fixed what, who should pay for it, and whether the property has been looked after to the standard the lease requires.
These disputes can be costly for both sides, particularly where the parties never nailed down the property's starting condition in writing. This guide walks through how repair obligations tend to work under a commercial lease in England and Wales, the remedies a landlord can pursue if a tenant falls short, and the practical routes to resolving a claim before it escalates into litigation.
If you are dealing with a repair dispute right now, speaking to someone who understands how these cases unfold can save considerable time and money.
What this document is
A repair claim in a commercial context is a demand, usually made by a landlord against a tenant, that work be carried out (or paid for) to put right physical issues with the leased premises. The claim is almost always rooted in the wording of the lease itself, which sets out what each party has agreed to maintain.
Claims may arise during the term of the lease or, more commonly, at or near the end, when the landlord prepares what is often called a schedule of dilapidations. That document lists alleged breaches of the tenant's repair, decoration, and reinstatement obligations, together with the landlord's estimated cost of remedying them.
Not every item on such a schedule is automatically payable. Statutory limits, the actual condition of the building at the start of the lease, the landlord's plans for the property after the lease ends, and the specific wording of the repair covenant all affect what a tenant genuinely owes. Understanding where the boundary sits between legitimate claim and overreach is where most disputes are won or lost.
How to use this document
Read the repair covenant carefully. The starting point is always the lease wording. Phrases like 'keep in repair', 'keep in good and substantial repair', or 'full repairing and insuring' carry different weight. Work out precisely what parts of the property the tenant covers, whether decoration and reinstatement are included, and whether there are any caveats linked to a schedule of condition.
Locate the schedule of condition, if one exists. A photographic or written schedule of condition attached to the lease can dramatically limit a tenant's exposure, because it fixes the standard the property must be returned in. If you have one, compare it to the current state of the premises before engaging with any claim. If you don't, gather whatever dated evidence you can about the property's original state.
Assess the schedule of dilapidations item by item. When a landlord serves a schedule, go through each alleged breach individually. Consider whether the item is genuinely disrepair rather than fair wear and tear, whether the remedial method proposed is reasonable, and whether the costs claimed are proportionate to the actual damage.
Consider the statutory cap on damages. Under section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, damages for breach of a repair covenant cannot exceed the reduction in the property's value caused by the disrepair. If the landlord intends to redevelop or substantially alter the premises, that can cap or even extinguish the claim entirely.
Try to settle before issuing proceedings. Most commercial repair claims settle. The Dilapidations Protocol encourages early exchange of information, endorsed surveyor's reports, and without prejudice negotiation. Litigation is expensive and uncertain, so a negotiated financial settlement is very often the most sensible outcome for both sides.
Q Who is usually responsible for repairs in a commercial lease?
It depends entirely on the lease. Many commercial leases are granted on 'full repairing and insuring' terms, which push most repair obligations onto the tenant, including structural elements. Shorter or internal-only leases may leave the landlord responsible for the exterior, roof, and structure. There is no single default rule, so the specific wording of the repair covenant in your lease is what matters.
Q What is a schedule of dilapidations?
It is a document, typically prepared by a building surveyor acting for the landlord, that lists alleged breaches of the tenant's repair, decoration, and reinstatement covenants. It usually includes the remedial work said to be required and a costing. Schedules can be served during the lease (interim) or at or after the end of the term (terminal). They are the starting point for most repair claims, not the final word.
Q Does fair wear and tear have to be put right?
Generally no, provided the lease expressly excludes fair wear and tear from the tenant's repair obligation. Where the lease contains an ordinary 'keep in repair' covenant without that exclusion, a tenant can still be liable for gradual deterioration. This is one of the most contested areas in practice, because the line between disrepair and wear is not always obvious.
Q Can a landlord claim more than the cost of the repairs?
Usually not, and often less. Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 caps damages at the diminution in the reversionary value of the property caused by the breach. If the landlord plans to demolish or significantly refurbish the premises, the loss in value may be minimal, which can reduce a large-looking schedule to very little in recoverable damages.
Q What is a schedule of condition and why does it matter?
A schedule of condition is a dated record, often photographic, of the property's state at the start of the lease. Where the repair covenant is qualified by reference to that schedule, the tenant only has to return the premises in no worse condition than shown. It is one of the single most effective tools for limiting a tenant's dilapidations exposure, and its absence tends to favour landlords.
Q Can a landlord forfeit the lease over unrepaired damage?
Potentially, but it is not straightforward. The Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 gives qualifying tenants protection against forfeiture and damages claims for disrepair by requiring the landlord to serve a specific notice first. Forfeiture for disrepair is rare in practice; most landlords prefer to pursue damages or specific performance, particularly where the tenant is still paying rent.
Q How are most repair disputes actually resolved?
The overwhelming majority settle through negotiation, often after each side has obtained a surveyor's report and exchanged correspondence under the Dilapidations Protocol. Mediation is also commonly used. Court proceedings are a last resort because of the cost, delay, and the statutory cap on damages, which together make trial a risky option for landlords with ambitious claims.
Facing a repair claim and not sure where you stand?
Dilapidations schedules and repair covenants are often more negotiable than they first appear, and the right approach depends on the wording of your lease and the facts on the ground. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through your options based on what you describe on the call, whether you are the landlord pursuing a claim or the tenant responding to one.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the claim
✓Practical perspective on how strong the position looks based on what you describe
✓What to watch out for when responding to or serving a schedule
✓A clearer sense of your next steps before things escalate
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.