Skip to main content
Find your template →
Menu

Traditional Construction Contracts UK: A Practical Guide

We're not a law firm — we help you find the right legal support. For advice on your situation, speak to a legal adviser or find a solicitor.

Part ofConstruction

Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
If you are planning a building project in the UK, one of the earliest decisions you will face is how to structure the contract between you and the people who will design and build it. The traditional route, sometimes called the conventional or lump sum approach, remains one of the most widely used methods on projects of all sizes, from home extensions to commercial developments. It keeps design and construction separate, gives you a fixed price before work starts, and lets you retain meaningful control over how the finished building looks and functions. This guide walks through how traditional contracts work in practice, where they tend to shine, where they can catch you out, and the practical points worth thinking about before you commit. If anything here raises a question about your own project, a short call with an experienced legal adviser can help you think it through based on what you describe.

What this document is

A traditional construction contract is an arrangement where the employer (often called the client) takes responsibility for the design and then appoints a contractor to build what has been designed. You typically engage an architect, and often a structural engineer, quantity surveyor and other consultants, to produce a full set of drawings and specifications.

Once the design is sufficiently developed, contractors are invited to price the work, usually on a lump sum basis. The successful bidder then enters into a building contract with you and constructs the project to the design you have supplied.

Standard form contracts published by the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) are the most common in England and Wales, with variants for minor works, intermediate projects and larger schemes. The defining feature is the split of responsibility: the design team owes you a duty in relation to the design, and the contractor owes you a duty to build it properly.

That separation is what gives traditional contracts their clarity, but it is also where most disputes originate when things go wrong.

How to use this document

  1. Define your brief and appoint a design team. Start by writing down what you want the project to achieve, your budget ceiling, and any non-negotiable requirements such as planning constraints, timescales or sustainability goals. Appoint an architect and any other consultants you need, and agree clear terms of engagement covering fees, scope, and professional indemnity insurance before any design work begins.
  2. Develop the design to a biddable level. Work with your consultants to produce drawings, specifications and, where appropriate, a bill of quantities that describe the project in enough detail for contractors to price accurately. Skimping at this stage is the single biggest source of later cost overruns and variations, so allow time for planning permission, building control input and any specialist surveys.
  3. Tender the work to suitable contractors. Invite a shortlist of contractors to submit competitive prices against the tender documents. Ask for references, check financial standing, confirm insurance cover, and compare not just the headline price but also programme, method statements and any qualifications contractors have attached to their bids. The cheapest quote is rarely the best value once risk is accounted for.
  4. Put the building contract in place. Select an appropriate standard form, typically a JCT contract sized to the project, and complete the contract particulars to reflect what has been agreed on price, programme, liquidated damages, retention, insurance and dispute resolution. Do not start work on site until the contract is signed; oral or ad hoc arrangements are where homeowners and small developers most often come unstuck.
  5. Administer the contract through to completion. During construction, your contract administrator (often the architect) issues instructions, certifies payments, manages variations and assesses any claims for extensions of time. Keep written records of everything, attend site meetings, and deal with issues promptly. After practical completion, a defects rectification period follows, at the end of which a final certificate is issued and any retention released.

Common questions

Q How does a traditional contract differ from design and build?
Under a traditional contract, you employ the designers and then a separate contractor to build their design, so design risk sits with the consultants. Under design and build, one contractor takes responsibility for both. Traditional gives you more control over aesthetics and detail, while design and build can transfer more risk and may be quicker, but usually with less client input once the contractor is appointed.
Q Is a lump sum price really fixed?
The contract sum is fixed for the scope described in the tender documents, but it can change. Variations instructed by the client, unforeseen ground conditions, provisional sums, and changes in statutory requirements can all adjust the final figure. Holding a sensible contingency, often around 10 percent for domestic and refurbishment work, is prudent because the headline lump sum rarely survives entirely intact from start to finish.
Q Which JCT contract should I use?
It depends on the size and complexity of the project. JCT publishes forms for minor works, intermediate and standard building projects, as well as a dedicated Home Owner contract for domestic clients. Matching the form to the job matters because the wrong contract can leave gaps in payment, variation or dispute procedures. If you are unsure which fits your project, it is worth taking guidance before you sign.
Q What happens if the contractor finishes late?
Most traditional contracts include a liquidated damages clause setting a fixed rate the contractor pays for each day or week of delay beyond the completion date. The contractor may be entitled to an extension of time for delays caused by the client, instructed variations or other listed events. Keeping careful records of instructions and correspondence is essential if a delay dispute arises later.
Q Do I need a collateral warranty?
On commercial projects, collateral warranties are often given by the contractor and design team to funders, tenants and future purchasers so they can sue if there is a defect. For a private home project they are less common but can be useful, particularly if you may sell in the short term. The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 can achieve similar outcomes if drafted into the main contract.
Q What is retention and why does it matter?
Retention is a percentage of each payment, commonly 3 to 5 percent, that the employer holds back as security for the contractor completing defects. Half is usually released at practical completion and the balance at the end of the defects rectification period. It gives you leverage to get snags fixed, but it also affects the contractor's cash flow, so the figure should be proportionate.
Q How are disputes usually resolved?
The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 gives most parties to a construction contract a statutory right to refer disputes to adjudication, which produces a binding decision within 28 days. Contracts also typically provide for mediation, arbitration or litigation as a final route. Most disputes settle before reaching court, but having the procedure clearly set out in the contract makes resolution much quicker.

Sources

This guide is based on primary UK law and official guidance.

Brad Askew, Solicitor (non-practising)

Written & reviewed by

Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)

Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.

Legal disclaimer
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.