Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Construction contracts sit at the sharp end of commercial law. Get the drafting right and projects run smoothly; get it wrong and you are looking at delayed payments, stalled works, and disputes that drag on for years. In England and Wales, the backbone of construction contract law is the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (often called the Construction Act), as amended by the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009.
Whether you are a contractor, subcontractor, developer or employer, the negotiation stage is where most of the real risk is allocated. This guide walks through the core areas to focus on: payment, risk, termination and dispute resolution. It is written for people sitting down to negotiate a deal who want to understand what the law says, what is usually negotiable, and where getting a second opinion before signing tends to pay off.
What this document is
A construction contract, in the legal sense used by the Construction Act, covers an agreement for 'construction operations' carried out in the UK. That includes building work, civil engineering, installation of fittings, site clearance, painting, decorating and related professional services such as architectural or surveying input.
The Act applies whether the contract is a bespoke document, a standard form such as JCT or NEC, or a short letter of intent. One of the most important things to understand about construction contracts in England and Wales is that certain statutory terms will be read into any contract that falls within the Act, even if the parties did not agree to them.
If your contract is silent on payment timing, or tries to exclude adjudication, the Scheme for Construction Contracts steps in to fill the gap. That means negotiation is not just about what you write down, it is about understanding what the law will impose regardless. A well-drafted contract works with the statutory framework rather than trying to work around it.
How to use this document
Map the commercial position before drafting. Before any clauses get written, both sides should be clear on scope of works, timescales, pricing model (fixed price, remeasurement, cost plus), and who is responsible for design. Ambiguity at this stage tends to surface later as a dispute, so pin down the commercial deal first and then translate it into legal language.
Allocate risk deliberately, not by default. Risk allocation covers ground conditions, delay, variations, defects, insurance and force majeure. The party best placed to manage a risk should usually carry it. Walk through each major risk on the project and decide who bears it, how it is priced, and what happens if it materialises. Standard forms allocate risk in set ways, so read the amendments carefully.
Get payment provisions right. The Construction Act requires an adequate mechanism for determining what is due and when, and it prohibits 'pay when paid' clauses except in narrow insolvency scenarios. Agree the payment cycle, due dates, final dates for payment, and the notice regime for payment notices and pay less notices. If these are missing or defective, the Scheme imposes its own terms.
Define termination grounds and process clearly. Termination clauses need to set out the triggers (material breach, insolvency, prolonged suspension, convenience), the notice period, and what happens on termination including payment for work done, removal from site, and handover of design material. Vague termination rights are a common source of litigation, so precision here matters.
Build in a workable dispute resolution ladder. Parties to a construction contract have a statutory right to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time. Beyond that, consider whether disputes should go to arbitration or the courts (the Technology and Construction Court handles most construction claims), and whether to include mediation or expert determination as an earlier step.
Q Does the Construction Act apply to every building contract?
The Act applies to most contracts for construction operations carried out in the UK, including subcontracts and contracts with professional consultants. There are carve-outs, for example contracts with residential occupiers for work on their own home are generally excluded. The definition of construction operations is quite broad but does exclude some activities like drilling for oil and gas, or manufacturing of components off-site unless installation is also included.
Q What is a 'pay when paid' clause and why does it matter?
A pay when paid clause tries to make payment to a subcontractor conditional on the main contractor first being paid by the employer. Section 113 of the Construction Act makes these clauses ineffective, with a limited exception where the third party paying up the chain becomes insolvent. In negotiation, subcontractors should push back on anything that looks like conditional payment, and main contractors should not rely on such clauses to manage cash flow.
Q What notices are required for payment under the Construction Act?
The Act requires a payment notice specifying the sum due and the basis of calculation, usually issued by the paying party or the payee. If the paying party wants to pay less than the notified sum, they must serve a pay less notice within the contractual timescale. Miss the pay less notice and the notified sum generally becomes payable in full, which is the basis of many 'smash and grab' adjudications.
Q What is adjudication and can it be excluded?
Adjudication is a fast-track dispute resolution procedure under section 108 of the Construction Act. Either party can refer a dispute to an adjudicator at any time, and a decision is usually reached within 28 days. The decision is binding unless and until overturned in later court or arbitration proceedings. The right to adjudicate cannot be contracted out of in a qualifying construction contract.
Q Should we use a standard form like JCT or NEC, or a bespoke contract?
Standard forms such as JCT, NEC and FIDIC are well understood by the industry and have been tested in the courts, which reduces uncertainty. Bespoke contracts can be tailored to unusual projects but take longer to negotiate and carry more drafting risk. Many projects use a standard form with a schedule of amendments, which is often a sensible middle ground if the amendments are handled carefully.
Q How are variations usually handled in a construction contract?
Variations clauses allow the employer or contract administrator to instruct changes to the scope of works, with corresponding adjustments to price and time. Key negotiation points include who can instruct variations, how they are valued (agreed rates, fair valuation, daywork rates), whether the contractor can object, and the notice requirements. Poorly drafted variations clauses are one of the most common sources of dispute on a project.
Q What happens if we start work before the contract is signed?
Starting work under a letter of intent or on handshake terms is common but risky. If work qualifies as construction operations, the Construction Act still applies and the Scheme will fill gaps. Disputes about scope, price and termination are much harder to resolve without a signed contract. If you must start early, use a carefully drafted letter of intent with a cap on spend and a clear path to the full contract.
Construction contracts move fast and the drafting choices you make on payment, risk and termination have real consequences once works start. An experienced legal adviser can talk through the key clauses based on what you describe, so you know what to push back on before you sign.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions on the contract terms
✓Practical perspective on payment, termination and dispute clauses based on what you describe
✓What to watch out for in your specific situation
✓A clearer sense of your next steps before signing
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.