Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Construction projects rarely run without friction. Payment delays, variations, defects, and programme slippage all create the conditions for disagreement, and when disputes escalate, the cost of court proceedings can quickly dwarf the sum in issue. Alternative Dispute Resolution, commonly shortened to ADR, gives parties a range of routes to settle matters without a full trial.
Some methods are quick and statutory, others are confidential and relationship-focused, and a few deliver binding outcomes enforceable in the same way as court judgments. This guide walks through the main ADR routes used across the UK construction sector, setting out how each one works, when it tends to be most useful, and the practical trade-offs involved.
Whether you are a contractor chasing an interim payment, a developer dealing with a defects claim, or a subcontractor caught in a chain of disagreements, understanding your options is the first step toward choosing the right path.
Overview
Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to any method of settling a dispute outside traditional court litigation. In the construction context, ADR has become the default expectation rather than the exception, partly because of the sector's heavy reliance on standard form contracts (such as JCT and NEC) that build ADR procedures directly into their dispute clauses, and partly because the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 gives most parties a statutory right to adjudicate.
The four most common routes are adjudication, mediation, arbitration, and expert determination. Each has its own character. Adjudication is fast and imposed by statute for qualifying contracts. Mediation is consensual and aims for a negotiated settlement. Arbitration resembles a private trial with a binding award.
Expert determination hands a technical question to a specialist whose decision the parties agree to accept. Choosing between them depends on the nature of the dispute, the value at stake, the relationship between the parties, and whether speed, confidentiality, or finality matters most.
Key steps
Identify the nature of the dispute. Before reaching for any ADR process, pin down what is actually in issue. A payment dispute behaves very differently from a technical defect or a delay claim. Knowing whether the disagreement is contractual, technical, or factual helps you match the dispute to the right resolution method and avoid wasted time on a forum that cannot give you what you need.
Review the contract's dispute resolution clause. Most construction contracts set out a specific procedure, sometimes a tiered approach requiring negotiation or mediation before adjudication or arbitration. Read the clause carefully, including any notice requirements, time limits, and named institutions. Skipping a contractual step can undermine your position later, so treat the clause as your starting map rather than an afterthought.
Consider statutory adjudication rights. If your contract falls within the scope of the Construction Act, either party has the right to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time. This is often the quickest way to unlock a payment dispute because the adjudicator must usually decide within 28 days of referral, and the decision is enforceable on an interim basis even if later challenged.
Weigh speed, cost, confidentiality and finality. Each ADR route balances these factors differently. Adjudication is rapid but temporarily binding. Mediation is cheap and private but requires willingness to settle. Arbitration produces a final, enforceable award but can be as costly as litigation. Expert determination is focused and efficient but limited to defined technical questions. Choose the route that fits your priorities.
Prepare your evidence and submissions carefully. Whichever route you take, the strength of your case depends on clear documentation: contract terms, correspondence, programme records, payment applications, photographs, and expert input where relevant. ADR timetables are often compressed, particularly in adjudication, so start gathering evidence early and present your arguments in a structured, easy-to-follow way.
Common questions
Q What is adjudication and when can I use it?
Adjudication is a statutory dispute resolution process available to parties under most UK construction contracts, governed by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. Either party can refer a dispute at any time, and the adjudicator typically issues a decision within 28 days of referral. It is especially popular for payment disputes, final account disagreements, and delay claims because of its speed and the courts' willingness to enforce decisions quickly.
Q Is mediation legally binding in construction disputes?
Mediation itself is not binding. The process is voluntary and the mediator has no power to impose an outcome. However, if the parties reach an agreement during mediation and sign a settlement agreement, that written agreement becomes a contract and is enforceable like any other. Mediation works best where the parties want to preserve a commercial relationship or reach a practical compromise without the cost of a contested hearing.
Q How does arbitration differ from litigation?
Arbitration is a private process where an arbitrator (or panel) hears evidence and issues a binding award, which can generally be enforced in court under the Arbitration Act 1996. Unlike litigation, hearings are confidential, the parties can choose the arbitrator, and the procedure can be tailored. It can still be lengthy and expensive, but many construction contracts favour it for its privacy and the expertise of specialist arbitrators.
Q What is expert determination?
Expert determination is an ADR process where the parties appoint an independent specialist, often a quantity surveyor, engineer, or architect, to decide a specific technical or valuation issue. The expert's decision is usually binding by contract. It is well suited to narrow disputes such as valuations, measurement questions, or technical compliance, but less appropriate for broad multi-issue disputes involving contested facts or legal argument.
Q Can an adjudicator's decision be challenged?
Yes, but only on limited grounds. An adjudicator's decision is binding on an interim basis and must be complied with until the dispute is finally determined by litigation, arbitration, or agreement. Challenges typically focus on jurisdiction or serious procedural unfairness. Simply disagreeing with the outcome is not enough. Courts in England and Wales have generally taken a robust approach to enforcement to support the statutory scheme.
Q Do I need a solicitor to use ADR?
You are not required to have legal representation for most ADR processes, and in lower-value disputes many parties handle matters themselves or with input from a surveyor or consultant. That said, the procedural and evidential requirements, particularly in adjudication and arbitration, can be demanding. Many parties instruct specialist construction lawyers or claims consultants to prepare submissions, especially where significant sums or reputational issues are at stake.
Q Which ADR method is cheapest?
Mediation is generally the least expensive option because sessions are short, the mediator's fee is shared, and no formal evidence process is required. Expert determination can also be cost-effective for narrow technical issues. Adjudication is relatively quick but can still involve significant legal and expert costs, while arbitration tends to be the most expensive route, sometimes rivalling court litigation depending on the complexity and length of the hearing.
Sources
This guide is based on primary UK law and official guidance.
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.