Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Running a charity well means making decisions that serve the cause, not the people sitting around the board table. That sounds obvious, but in practice trustees often hold overlapping roles, personal connections and outside interests that can quietly pull decisions off course.
Knowing how to spot these tensions early, declare them properly and manage them without drama is one of the most important parts of good governance. This page sets out how conflicts of interest work in the UK charity sector, what trustees are expected to do under the Charities Act 2011 and Charity Commission guidance, and how boards can build habits that keep decision-making clean.
It's written for trustees, company secretaries and charity managers who want to get this right rather than just tick a box, and who occasionally need a sounding board when a tricky situation lands on the agenda.
Overview
A conflict of interest in a charity context is any situation where a trustee's personal, financial or professional interests could influence, or could reasonably appear to influence, a decision they take on behalf of the charity. It isn't about bad character.
Most conflicts arise from ordinary life: a trustee's employer bids for a contract, a family member applies for a grant, a trustee sits on the board of a partner organisation, or a proposed policy would benefit a community group they're personally involved with. The law recognises two main types.
A direct conflict involves a personal benefit to the trustee, such as payment or employment. A conflict of loyalty involves competing duties, for instance where a trustee also represents a funder, local authority or another charity with overlapping interests. Both types matter because trustees owe a fiduciary duty to act solely in the charity's best interests.
The Charity Commission expects boards to have a written policy, a register of interests, and a consistent way of handling conflicts when they appear. Handled openly, most conflicts are straightforward. Handled badly, they can lead to regulatory scrutiny, reputational damage and even personal liability.
Key steps
Put a written conflicts policy in place. Every charity board should adopt a policy that defines what counts as a conflict, explains the difference between direct financial conflicts and conflicts of loyalty, and sets out how declarations are recorded and handled. The policy should be reviewed periodically and signed off at board level, so trustees know exactly what is expected of them.
Maintain a live register of interests. Keep a central record of each trustee's outside roles, employments, directorships, significant shareholdings, family connections and any relationships with suppliers, beneficiaries or partner organisations. Ask trustees to update their entry on joining, annually, and whenever circumstances change. The register should be readily available to the whole board and, in many cases, published or summarised for transparency.
Declare conflicts at the start of every meeting. Make conflicts a standing item on the agenda so trustees are prompted to disclose any interest in matters being discussed that day. Declarations should be minuted clearly, including the nature of the interest and what action was taken, so there is a documented trail if questions arise later.
Manage the conflict proportionately. Once an interest is declared, the board should decide how to handle it. Options include the conflicted trustee leaving the room for the discussion, not voting, not receiving the relevant papers, or delegating the decision to a sub-committee of unconflicted trustees. The approach should match the seriousness of the conflict, and the reasoning should be recorded in the minutes.
Escalate where the conflict cannot be managed. Some conflicts are too fundamental to handle internally, for example, where a significant proportion of the board is conflicted on a major decision, or where a trustee stands to gain materially and the governing document doesn't authorise it. In these cases the board may need to seek Charity Commission authorisation, take independent guidance, or reconsider whether the transaction should proceed at all.
Q What is the difference between an actual and a perceived conflict of interest?
An actual conflict exists where a trustee's personal interest genuinely competes with the charity's interests on a specific decision. A perceived conflict is one that a reasonable outsider might think exists, even if the trustee would in fact act impartially. Both matter. Charity Commission guidance expects boards to manage perceived conflicts as carefully as actual ones, because public trust depends on how decisions look as well as how they are made.
Q Can a trustee be paid by the charity they serve?
Trustees are generally expected to serve unpaid, and payment for acting as a trustee is tightly restricted. Payment for goods or services provided to the charity may be permitted in limited circumstances, usually where the governing document allows it or the Charity Commission has given authority, and where strict conditions are met. Any such arrangement creates an obvious conflict, so it must be declared, properly authorised and clearly documented.
Q Do we have to publish our register of interests?
There is no universal legal requirement to publish the full register, but many charities make a summary public as part of their annual report or on their website. Larger charities and those working closely with the public sector are often expected to be more transparent. Even where publication isn't required, keeping the register thorough and accessible internally is treated by the Charity Commission as a basic feature of good governance.
Q What happens if a trustee fails to declare a conflict?
Non-declaration is a serious governance failure. Consequences can include decisions being reopened or set aside, reputational damage to the charity, and in some cases personal liability for the trustee if the charity suffers loss. Persistent or deliberate non-disclosure may lead to Charity Commission involvement. Boards should make it easy to declare interests and treat honest, late disclosures as better than silence, while taking deliberate concealment seriously.
Q How often should the conflicts policy be reviewed?
Most charities review their conflicts of interest policy at least every one to two years, and sooner if there has been a significant change, for example a new funding relationship, a trading subsidiary, a merger, or a change in Charity Commission guidance. The review should check that the policy still reflects how the charity actually operates and that trustees understand how to apply it in real meetings, not just on paper.
Q When should we involve the Charity Commission?
The Commission generally expects boards to handle conflicts themselves using their policy and governing document. Involvement becomes appropriate where authorisation is needed for a benefit to a trustee or connected person, where the board cannot form a quorum of unconflicted trustees on an important decision, or where a serious incident involving conflicts of interest needs to be reported. If in doubt, it is usually better to check the Commission's guidance early rather than act first and explain later.
Q Do conflicts of interest rules apply to senior staff as well as trustees?
Trustees carry the primary legal duties, but most charities extend their conflicts policy to senior staff, key volunteers and committee members who influence decisions or spending. This is good practice rather than a strict statutory requirement. Applying the same declaration and management process across everyone with real decision-making influence keeps the culture consistent and avoids awkward gaps where a staff member's interests are treated less rigorously than a trustee's.
Conflicts of interest often sit in grey areas, family connections, overlapping roles, funders at the table, and the right answer depends on the facts in front of you. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through your options on a call, tailored to what you describe about your charity and the situation.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about trustee duties
✓Practical perspective on how to manage the conflict you describe
✓A clearer sense of what to watch out for in your circumstances
✓Help thinking through whether Charity Commission input may be needed
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.