Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When someone close to you dies and the contents of their will feel wrong, questions about whether they truly understood what they were signing often come to the surface. Maybe they were in the later stages of dementia. Maybe a new will appeared in the final weeks of their life, rewriting years of earlier intentions.
Maybe a family member who barely visited suddenly became the main beneficiary. Mental capacity is one of the most common reasons a will is challenged in England and Wales, and it is also one of the hardest grounds to prove.
This page walks through what testamentary capacity actually means under UK law, how courts assess it, and what a capacity dispute realistically involves if you are thinking about contesting a will or defending one that has been challenged.
What this document is
Testamentary capacity is the mental threshold a person must meet at the moment they make a will for that will to stand up legally. The leading test still comes from an 1870 case, Banks v Goodfellow, which remains the yardstick courts apply in England and Wales despite the more recent Mental Capacity Act 2005.
In simple terms, the person making the will (the testator) must understand that they are making a will and what it does, have a general grasp of what they own, recognise the people who might reasonably expect to benefit, and not be suffering from any disorder of the mind that twists their sense of what is right. A will disputed on capacity grounds can be set aside entirely, which usually means an earlier valid will takes effect, or if none exists, the intestacy rules decide who inherits.
These disputes are fact-heavy, often turning on medical records, witness accounts, and the solicitor's file notes from the day the will was signed.
How to use this document
Gather the paperwork and the backstory. Pull together every version of the will you can find, any earlier drafts, and the contact details of the solicitor or will writer who prepared the final document. Note down when the testator's health started to decline, who was around them at the time, and anything that felt off about how the will came to be signed. A clear timeline is the backbone of any capacity challenge.
Request the will file and medical records. Under the Larke v Nugus principle, the solicitor who drafted the will can be asked to disclose their file, including attendance notes and any capacity assessment. You can also apply for the deceased's GP records and hospital notes, which often reveal dementia diagnoses, delirium episodes, or medication that clouded judgement around the date the will was signed.
Consider lodging a caveat at the Probate Registry. A caveat stops a grant of probate being issued while you investigate, giving you breathing room to build a case. Caveats last six months and can be renewed. This step matters because once probate is granted and the estate is distributed, unwinding it becomes far harder and more expensive.
Get a medical expert view on capacity. Courts place heavy weight on retrospective opinions from geriatric psychiatrists or other specialists who can review the records and comment on whether the testator likely met the Banks v Goodfellow test on the relevant date. Without this kind of evidence, a capacity claim is often little more than a hunch, and hunches do not win in court.
Try to resolve it before issuing a claim. Litigation over wills is expensive, slow, and corrosive to family relationships. Mediation, a round-table meeting, or a negotiated variation of the estate can often land a better outcome than a contested trial. If settlement fails, a claim in the Chancery Division is the formal route, but most capacity disputes settle long before a judge hears them.
It is the common law test for testamentary capacity in England and Wales, dating from 1870. The testator must understand the nature of making a will, know roughly what they own, appreciate who might expect to inherit, and be free from any mental disorder that distorts their decisions. Courts still apply this test in preference to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 when deciding whether a will is valid.
Q Can a person with dementia still make a valid will?
Yes, in many cases. Dementia is not an automatic bar to making a will. What matters is whether the person had sufficient understanding at the specific moment they gave instructions and signed. Someone in the early stages of dementia may have lucid periods where capacity is intact. A careful solicitor will often arrange a contemporaneous medical assessment, sometimes called the golden rule, to record capacity at the time.
Q Who has to prove a lack of capacity in a will dispute?
The starting point is that a will which looks rational on its face and was properly executed is presumed valid. If someone challenging the will raises a real doubt about capacity, the burden shifts to the person trying to uphold the will to prove the testator did have capacity when they made it. This is why medical records and the drafting solicitor's file are so important.
Q How long do I have to contest a will on capacity grounds?
There is no strict statutory deadline for a capacity challenge, but delay makes claims much harder. Evidence fades, witnesses die, and once the estate has been distributed, recovery becomes complicated. Lodging a caveat at the Probate Registry before the grant is issued is the safest way to protect your position. Other types of claim, such as under the Inheritance Act 1975, do have fixed time limits.
Q What happens if a will is found invalid?
If the court sets a will aside for lack of capacity, the estate is distributed under the most recent earlier will that was validly made. If there is no earlier valid will, the intestacy rules in the Administration of Estates Act 1925 apply, which follow a fixed hierarchy of spouses, children, and other relatives. This can produce a very different result from what the disputed will set out.
Q Is undue influence the same as lack of capacity?
No. Capacity is about whether the testator's mind was sound enough to understand what they were doing. Undue influence is about whether someone else pressured or manipulated them into making a will they would not otherwise have made. The two grounds often overlap in practice, particularly with elderly testators, but they are separate legal arguments with different evidence needed to prove them.
Q How much does it cost to contest a will?
Costs vary widely depending on complexity, the value of the estate, and whether the case settles. A contested trial in the Chancery Division can run into tens of thousands of pounds. Some solicitors offer conditional fee arrangements or after-the-event insurance. Check gov.uk for current court fees. Early legal guidance on whether a claim is worth pursuing usually pays for itself.
Capacity disputes turn on detail, timing, and evidence that is often buried in medical notes and solicitor file notes. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through whether there is something worth investigating based on what you describe, and what your realistic next steps look like.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the will
✓Practical perspective on whether a capacity challenge is worth pursuing in your situation
✓Guidance tailored to what you describe about the testator and the circumstances
✓What to watch out for before probate is granted or the estate is distributed
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.