Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When someone dies, their will is meant to be the honest record of how they wanted their estate divided. Sadly, that is not always what happens. Signatures get forged, vulnerable people get pressured into changes they did not really want, and sometimes entire documents appear that bear little resemblance to the deceased's actual wishes.
If something about a will feels wrong to you, the law in England and Wales does give you routes to challenge it, but the process is technical and the evidential burden sits with the person raising the objection. This guide walks through what fraud looks like in a probate context, the warning signs worth paying attention to, and the practical steps you can take if you believe a relative's final wishes have been hijacked.
What this document is
Fraud, in the context of a will, is a broad label covering any dishonest conduct that causes a testator's true intentions to be distorted or overridden. It is one of several grounds on which a will can be contested in England and Wales, sitting alongside lack of testamentary capacity, lack of proper execution under the Wills Act 1837, lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence.
Where fraud is alleged, the court is being asked to find that a specific person acted dishonestly, either by fabricating a document, by tricking the testator, or by deliberately hiding information that would have changed the testator's decisions. Because fraud is a serious allegation with serious consequences, judges expect clear and cogent evidence rather than suspicion.
A successful challenge can result in the fraudulent will being set aside entirely, with an earlier valid will taking effect instead, or the estate passing under the intestacy rules if no earlier will exists.
How to use this document
Gather your concerns and evidence early. Before taking any formal action, write down what you know, who told you, and when you learned it. Collect copies of any wills you have seen, correspondence with the deceased, medical records where relevant, and notes about anyone who appeared to have unusual control over the testator in their final months. Contemporaneous notes carry real weight later on.
Lodge a caveat at the Probate Registry. If probate has not yet been granted, entering a caveat prevents a grant from being issued while your concerns are investigated. A caveat lasts six months and can be renewed. This pauses the administration of the estate and gives you breathing room to look into the will before assets start being distributed. Check gov.uk for the current fee to enter a caveat.
Instruct an expert to examine the document. Where forgery or a suspicious signature is in play, a forensic document examiner or handwriting specialist can compare the disputed signature against known samples. For allegations around undue influence or capacity, medical records and witness statements from carers, neighbours and GPs often matter more than the document itself.
Open a dialogue with the executors. Many disputes settle without a courtroom. A solicitor's letter setting out your concerns and inviting the executors to respond can prompt disclosure of drafting files, attendance notes from the will writer, and earlier versions of the will. Mediation is strongly encouraged by the courts and can resolve matters far more cheaply than a contested probate claim.
Issue a claim in the High Court if necessary. If the matter cannot be resolved, formal proceedings are brought in the Chancery Division, usually as a probate claim seeking to prove the will in solemn form or to revoke a grant. These claims are document-heavy, involve witness evidence, and carry real cost risk for the losing party. Taking proper legal guidance before issuing is essential.
Anyone with a legitimate interest in the estate can potentially bring a challenge. That typically includes beneficiaries named in an earlier will, people who would inherit under the intestacy rules if the disputed will fell away, and in some cases creditors of the estate. You do not have to be a blood relative, but you do need to show that you would be financially affected if the will were set aside.
Q What is the difference between fraud and undue influence?
The two overlap but are distinct. Fraud involves active deception, such as lies told to the testator or a forged signature. Undue influence involves pressure or coercion that overbears the testator's free will, so that the will reflects someone else's wishes rather than their own. Both can invalidate a will, but the evidence needed is different and courts treat undue influence in wills as notoriously hard to prove.
Q How long do I have to challenge a fraudulent will?
There is no fixed statutory deadline for a probate claim alleging fraud, but acting promptly matters enormously. Once the estate has been distributed, recovering assets becomes much harder. If your claim overlaps with the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, a strict six-month deadline from the grant of probate applies. Always take advice quickly rather than waiting.
Q What happens if a will is found to be fraudulent?
If the court finds fraud, the offending will is declared invalid and any grant of probate based on it can be revoked. The estate is then administered under the most recent valid will, or under the rules of intestacy if none exists. In serious cases involving forgery, the matter may also be referred for criminal investigation, as forging a will is a criminal offence separate to the probate dispute.
Q How much does it cost to contest a will?
Costs vary widely depending on complexity, the volume of evidence, and whether the matter settles before trial. Probate disputes that reach a full hearing can run into tens of thousands of pounds, and the losing party is usually ordered to pay a significant portion of the winner's costs. Some solicitors offer conditional fee arrangements in strong cases. Mediation is almost always cheaper than litigation.
Q Can a will be partially invalidated for fraud?
Yes. The court has the power to strike out specific clauses procured by fraud while leaving the rest of the will intact, provided the remaining provisions still make sense as a coherent testamentary document. This often arises where a single gift or beneficiary has been inserted through deception but the rest of the will reflects the testator's genuine wishes.
Q What evidence do I need to prove fraud?
Courts require clear, cogent evidence rather than suspicion or theory. Useful material includes handwriting expert reports, the will drafter's file and attendance notes, medical records showing the testator's condition, evidence of the alleged fraudster's access and opportunity, bank records, and witness statements from people who knew the testator well. The burden sits firmly on the person alleging the fraud.
Contesting a will on the grounds of fraud is serious, evidence-heavy, and time-sensitive, and most people have no idea where to start. An experienced legal adviser can talk through your concerns based on what you describe and help you understand what your realistic options look like.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the will
✓Practical perspective on whether your concerns point toward fraud, undue influence or something else
✓Guidance tailored to what you describe about the testator and the circumstances
✓A clearer sense of the next sensible step, including whether a caveat may be urgent
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.