Skip to main content
Book a call — £89
Menu

Will Disputes UK: Types, Grounds & What to Do

We're not a law firm — we help you find the right legal support. For advice on your situation, speak to a legal adviser or find a solicitor.

Part ofWill Disputes

Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When someone dies and leaves a will that seems wrong, unfair, or simply out of character, the people left behind often feel they have nowhere to turn. Will disputes are more common in England and Wales than most people realise, and they can arise for all sorts of reasons: a sudden change to a long-standing will, a new partner who appears late in life, a signature that does not quite look right, or a family member who was quietly cut out. This page sets out the main categories of will dispute recognised by the courts, what each one involves in practical terms, and the sort of evidence that tends to matter. It is written for anyone who suspects a will does not reflect what the deceased really wanted, or who has been accused of influencing one.

What this document is

A will dispute is a formal challenge to the validity of a will, or a claim against the estate left behind, brought in the courts of England and Wales. The law recognises that a will is a serious legal document and generally treats it as valid once admitted to probate, but that presumption can be rebutted where there is good reason to doubt it.

Disputes tend to fall into two broad groups. The first group attacks the will itself, arguing that it should not stand at all because of how it was made or the state of mind of the person who made it.

The second group accepts the will is valid but argues that it fails to make reasonable financial provision for someone who depended on the deceased. Both routes have strict procedural rules, tight time limits, and a strong evidential burden on the person bringing the challenge. Understanding which category a concern falls into is usually the first practical step.

How to use this document

  1. Lack of testamentary capacity. This is the argument that the person making the will (the testator) did not have the mental ability to understand what they were doing at the moment the will was signed. The courts apply a long-standing test that looks at whether the testator grasped the nature of making a will, roughly what they owned, who might reasonably expect to benefit, and whether any disorder of the mind was affecting their choices. Conditions such as dementia, stroke, severe depression, or the effects of strong medication can all feed into a capacity challenge, but medical records and contemporaneous evidence usually carry the most weight.
  2. Undue influence and coercion. Here the claim is that the testator was pressured into making a will that did not reflect their own wishes. The pressure has to go beyond ordinary persuasion, flattery, or family politics: the courts look for conduct that overbore the testator's free will. These cases often involve an elderly or isolated person and someone close to them who controlled access, finances, or daily care. Undue influence is notoriously hard to prove because it usually happens behind closed doors, and the burden sits firmly on the person making the allegation.
  3. Forgery and fraud. A will can be challenged on the basis that the signature is not genuine, that pages have been swapped or altered, or that the testator was tricked into signing something they did not understand to be a will. Forensic handwriting experts, document examiners, and evidence from the witnesses who were present at signing all play a part. Fraud is a serious allegation and the courts expect clear, cogent evidence before setting a will aside on this ground.
  4. Want of knowledge and approval. Even where capacity and signature are not in question, a will can still fail if the testator did not genuinely know and approve its contents. This often crops up where someone who benefits heavily under the will was also involved in drafting it, or where the testator was blind, deaf, illiterate, or reliant on a translator. Suspicious circumstances shift the focus onto the person relying on the will to show that the testator really understood what they were signing.
  5. Improper execution and rectification. A will in England and Wales must meet the formalities set out in the Wills Act 1837: it must be in writing, signed by the testator, and witnessed correctly by two people present at the same time. A will that falls short of these rules can be declared invalid. Separately, where a will contains a clerical error or fails to carry out the testator's clear instructions, the court has a limited power to rectify it so it reflects what was actually intended.
  6. Claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. This is different from attacking the will itself. Certain categories of people, including spouses, civil partners, former spouses who have not remarried, children, cohabitees of at least two years, and others who were being maintained by the deceased, can ask the court to order reasonable financial provision from the estate. The claim usually has to be brought within six months of the grant of probate, so timing matters enormously.

Common questions

If you're dealing with this kind of situation, speak to an experienced legal adviser who can walk you through it — from £89.

Common questions

Q Who is allowed to contest a will in England and Wales?
Generally, anyone with a financial interest in the estate can bring a challenge. That includes beneficiaries named in the current or any earlier will, people who would inherit under the intestacy rules if the will were set aside, creditors of the estate, and dependants who may have a claim under the 1975 Act. Simply feeling the will is unfair is not enough on its own: you need legal standing and a recognised ground.
Q How long do I have to challenge a will?
Time limits depend on the type of claim. Claims under the Inheritance Act 1975 must usually be brought within six months of the grant of probate. Claims alleging fraud or forgery may have no strict time limit but delay weakens the case. Challenges on capacity, undue influence, or execution grounds should be raised as early as possible, ideally before probate is granted, by entering a caveat at the Probate Registry.
Q What is a caveat and when should I enter one?
A caveat is a formal notice lodged at the Probate Registry that prevents a grant of probate from being issued while concerns about the will are investigated. It lasts six months and can be renewed. Entering a caveat is often the first practical step where a dispute is brewing, because it freezes the estate administration and gives time to gather evidence before anything is distributed.
Q Does a homemade or DIY will make a dispute more likely?
It can. Homemade wills are more prone to execution errors, unclear wording, and gaps that lead to rectification claims or full-blown disputes. They may also lack the contemporaneous notes a solicitor would usually keep, which makes it harder to defend the will later against capacity or knowledge and approval challenges. A professionally drafted will is not immune from challenge but tends to leave a clearer evidential trail.
Q Can I challenge a will if I was left out entirely?
Possibly, but being excluded is not a ground in itself. English law generally respects testamentary freedom, meaning people can leave their estate to whoever they choose. You would usually need to show either that the will is invalid on one of the recognised grounds, or that you fall within a category of people entitled to bring a claim under the Inheritance Act 1975 for reasonable financial provision.
Q How much does it cost to dispute a will?
Costs vary widely depending on complexity, the evidence involved, and whether the matter settles or goes to trial. Contested probate litigation can become expensive quickly, and the losing party is often ordered to pay a share of the other side's costs. Many disputes are resolved through negotiation or mediation long before a final hearing, which tends to keep costs proportionate to what is at stake.
Q What evidence is most useful in a will dispute?
The strongest cases are built on contemporaneous evidence: the solicitor's file and attendance notes, GP and hospital records covering the period the will was made, the original will and any earlier versions, bank statements, and witness statements from people who knew the testator at the time. In forgery cases, expert handwriting analysis can be decisive. Preserving documents and taking statements early is important.
If you're dealing with this kind of situation, speak to an experienced legal adviser who can walk you through it — from £89.

Sources

This guide is based on primary UK law and official guidance.

Brad Askew, Solicitor (non-practising)

Written & reviewed by

Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)

Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.

Legal disclaimer
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.