Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
If you run or work on a construction site in the UK, the phrase 'method statement' will come up often, usually alongside a risk assessment. It is the written plan that sets out how a job will be done safely, from start to finish.
Done well, it translates a risk assessment into practical steps that the people actually doing the work can follow. Done badly, it becomes a box-ticking exercise that sits in a folder and helps no one. This guide walks through what a method statement is for, when you actually need one, what it should contain, and how to produce one that works on site rather than just on paper.
It is aimed at site managers, small contractors, and anyone commissioning construction work who needs to understand what good looks like.
Overview
A method statement is a written document that explains, step by step, how a particular piece of work will be carried out safely. It sits alongside the risk assessment: the risk assessment identifies the hazards and who might be harmed, and the method statement sets out the controls and the sequence of work that keep people safe in practice.
You will often hear the two referred to together as a RAMS document (Risk Assessment and Method Statement). Method statements are not a legal document in the strict sense, but they are strongly tied to duties under the Health and Safety at Work etc.
Act 1974 and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, known as CDM 2015. Principal contractors and contractors are expected to plan, manage and monitor work so that it is carried out without risks to health and safety, and a method statement is one of the most common ways to evidence that planning. For higher-risk tasks, clients and principal contractors will usually require one before work begins on site.
Key steps
Define the scope of the work. Start by describing exactly what the job is, where it will happen, who is doing it, and the timeframe. Vague scope leads to vague controls. If the job involves several distinct activities, consider whether each needs its own method statement rather than trying to cover everything in a single document.
Link it to a risk assessment. A method statement should never sit on its own. Carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment first, identifying the significant hazards, who could be harmed, and how. The method statement then shows how those risks will be controlled in the order the work is done, so the two documents speak to each other.
Set out the sequence of work. Break the job down into clear, numbered steps in the order they will happen on site. For each step, explain the control measures: exclusion zones, permits to work, the PPE needed, equipment checks, lifting plans, and who is responsible. Workers should be able to read it and know what to do next.
Cover emergencies and site-specific factors. Include what to do if something goes wrong: first aid arrangements, fire, rescue from height or confined spaces, spills, and how to raise the alarm. Address site-specific issues such as overhead services, neighbouring occupiers, traffic routes, and shared welfare, rather than relying on generic template wording.
Brief the team and keep it live. A method statement only works if the people doing the work have read it, understood it, and signed to confirm that. Brief the team before work starts, keep a copy on site, and update the document if conditions change. Treat it as a working tool, not a file note.
Q Is a method statement a legal requirement in the UK?
There is no single law that says 'thou shalt produce a method statement'. However, the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and CDM 2015 require employers and contractors to plan and control work so it is carried out safely. For higher-risk construction activities, a written method statement is generally the accepted way to demonstrate that planning, and clients and principal contractors will usually insist on one.
Q What is the difference between a risk assessment and a method statement?
A risk assessment identifies the hazards of a task, who could be harmed, and how serious the risk is. A method statement sets out how the work will be carried out step by step, incorporating the controls that keep those risks at an acceptable level. The two are often combined into a single RAMS document, but they are doing different jobs and both are needed.
Q Who should write the method statement?
It should be written by someone who understands both the work and the risks involved, typically a competent person within the contractor carrying out the task. A generic off-the-shelf template is rarely enough on its own, because site conditions vary. Larger projects often have a health and safety adviser or SHEQ manager reviewing and approving method statements before work starts.
Q When do I need a method statement for construction work?
You should prepare one for any task where the risk of serious injury or ill health is significant. Common triggers include work at height, excavations, lifting operations, hot works, working in confined spaces, demolition, asbestos work, and use of heavy plant. For low-risk, routine tasks a written method statement may not be necessary, but a risk assessment still is.
Q How detailed should a method statement be?
Detailed enough that someone new to the job could follow it and understand the hazards, the sequence, and the controls, but not so long that people stop reading. A good rule is to cover the scope, the team, the equipment, the step-by-step method, the PPE, emergency arrangements, and sign-off. If it is more than a few pages of dense text, it probably needs editing.
Q Do sole traders and small contractors need method statements?
Yes, if the work involves significant risk. Being small does not reduce the duty to plan work safely. Many principal contractors will not let you start on site without seeing a RAMS document, regardless of the size of your firm. For straightforward jobs you can keep it proportionate, but you still need to show you have thought through the hazards and controls.
Q How often should a method statement be reviewed?
Review it whenever site conditions change, when there is a near miss or incident, when new equipment or personnel are introduced, or when the scope of work shifts. On longer projects, periodic reviews make sense even without a specific trigger. A method statement that was written months ago and never revisited is rarely still accurate by the time the work is finished.
Method statements go wrong when they are too generic, too long, or disconnected from what actually happens on site. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through the health and safety duties that sit behind your document, based on what you describe about the job.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about method statements and RAMS
✓Practical perspective on the duties under CDM 2015 and the Health and Safety at Work Act as they apply to what you describe
✓Help thinking through what to watch out for on your specific project
✓Clarity on your next steps before work starts on site
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.