Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Few situations test an employer's judgement quite like an allegation of gross misconduct. When something serious has been reported, say theft, violence, a safeguarding concern, or a major breach of trust, the instinct to act fast has to be balanced against the need to act fairly.
Suspension is one tool available while the facts are being established, and it should never be used as a knee-jerk reaction or a form of punishment. A properly worded suspension letter sets the tone for everything that follows, from the investigation meeting to any eventual disciplinary hearing.
This guide walks through when suspension is appropriate, what the letter itself should cover, how to stay aligned with the ACAS Code of Practice, and the common mistakes that turn a straightforward process into an unfair dismissal claim at tribunal.
What this document is
A suspension letter for gross misconduct is the written record confirming that an employee has been temporarily removed from their duties while an allegation is investigated. It is not a dismissal letter and does not presume guilt. In English and Welsh employment law, suspension is considered a neutral act, though tribunals have made clear it should not be automatic.
The letter typically sets out the nature of the allegation in general terms, the fact that suspension is precautionary rather than disciplinary, confirmation that the employee remains on full pay and contractual benefits, the expected duration or review date, and what the employee can and cannot do during the period away from work. It should also explain who to contact, whether the employee may speak to colleagues, and what happens next in terms of investigation meetings.
Getting the tone right matters: the document becomes part of the paper trail if the matter escalates, and clumsy wording can undermine an otherwise reasonable process.
How to use this document
Consider whether suspension is genuinely necessary. Before reaching for the letter, ask whether the risk to the business, other staff, or the investigation itself actually requires the employee to be off site. Alternatives such as moving them to a different team, changing duties, or working from home may be more proportionate and less damaging to trust. 2. Hold a brief suspension conversation. Where possible, speak to the employee in person or by phone before sending written confirmation. Explain that suspension is precautionary, that it is not a finding of guilt, and that they will be paid as normal. Keep the meeting short, factual, and have a note-taker present to record what was said. 3. Draft the letter with care. The letter should describe the allegation in neutral terms without drawing conclusions, confirm the suspension is on full pay, set out expectations around confidentiality and contact with colleagues, and name the investigating officer. Avoid emotive language, avoid pre-judging the outcome, and make clear the employee will have a chance to respond. 4. Keep the suspension period under review. Suspension should be as short as reasonably possible. Courts have criticised employers who leave staff hanging for weeks without updates. Build in a review date, communicate progress regularly, and be ready to lift the suspension if circumstances change or the investigation concludes earlier than expected. 5. Move promptly to the next stage. Once the investigation is complete, decide whether to proceed to a formal disciplinary hearing, issue a lesser sanction, or take no action at all. Whatever the outcome, write to the employee clearly and follow the procedural steps set out in the ACAS Code so any decision can withstand scrutiny later.
Q Does the employee still get paid during suspension?
In almost all cases, yes. Suspension for the purpose of investigating gross misconduct should be on full pay unless the contract clearly permits otherwise, and even then unpaid suspension is risky. Stopping pay without clear contractual authority could amount to an unlawful deduction from wages and undermine any later disciplinary decision. Contractual benefits such as pension contributions and private healthcare normally continue as well.
Q How long can an employee be suspended for?
There is no fixed statutory limit, but suspension should last no longer than is strictly necessary to carry out a fair investigation. Employment tribunals have been critical of drawn-out suspensions that seem to drift. A good rule of thumb is to set a review date within two weeks, keep the employee informed of progress, and document the reasons if the period needs to be extended.
Q Is suspension itself a disciplinary sanction?
No. Suspension during an investigation is treated as a neutral act rather than a punishment. The letter should make this clear. However, case law has shown that suspending someone without proper thought can still breach the implied duty of trust and confidence, so it should not be used routinely or as a default response to every allegation.
Q Can the employee talk to colleagues while suspended?
The letter usually asks the employee not to discuss the allegation with colleagues, clients, or potential witnesses, so the investigation is not compromised. Reasonable social contact is generally fine. The restrictions should be proportionate and clearly explained, because cutting someone off entirely from their workplace network can feel punitive and damage the employment relationship.
Q What counts as gross misconduct?
Gross misconduct means conduct serious enough to destroy the trust between employer and employee, potentially justifying dismissal without notice. Common examples include theft, fraud, physical violence, serious bullying or harassment, gross negligence, serious breach of health and safety rules, and significant breaches of confidentiality. The disciplinary policy should list examples, but the list is never exhaustive and each case turns on its facts.
Q Does the ACAS Code apply to the suspension stage?
The ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures governs the overall process of which suspension may form part. While the Code itself focuses on investigations, meetings, and appeals, tribunals look at the whole handling of the matter. Unreasonable failure to follow the Code can lead to compensation in a successful claim being adjusted by up to 25 per cent.
Q What if suspension turns out to have been unjustified?
If an investigation finds no case to answer, the employee should be brought back to work promptly and the position explained clearly. The employer may also need to think about how to rebuild trust and protect the employee's reputation internally. A poorly handled suspension that later proves unnecessary can give rise to grievances or, in some cases, constructive unfair dismissal claims.
Getting the suspension stage wrong can unravel the whole disciplinary process and open the door to tribunal claims later. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through your options based on what you describe, so you feel more confident about the next move.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the situation
✓Practical perspective on whether suspension is proportionate in your circumstances
✓Guidance tailored to what you describe about the alleged conduct
✓A clearer sense of what to watch out for as the process unfolds
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.