Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
Handling misconduct properly matters. Get the process wrong and a dismissal further down the line can unravel at an employment tribunal, even when the underlying behaviour clearly warranted action. The first formal written warning sits at the heart of a fair disciplinary process in the UK, documenting what went wrong, what must change, and how long the warning will sit on file.
It follows a disciplinary hearing and usually comes after informal conversations or a verbal warning have not produced the improvement the employer was looking for. This guide walks through when a first written warning is appropriate, what it should contain, how it fits alongside the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, and the common traps employers fall into.
The aim is to help you run a process that is fair to the employee and defensible if it is later challenged.
What this document is
A first written warning is a formal step in a workplace disciplinary procedure. It is the written record issued to an employee after a disciplinary hearing where the employer has concluded that the conduct crossed a line, but not to the point of justifying a final written warning or dismissal.
The letter confirms what was decided at the hearing, summarises the misconduct, sets out the standard of behaviour now expected, and tells the employee how long the warning will remain live on their record. It also explains the employee's right to appeal and the consequences of further misconduct while the warning is active.
Because it creates a formal record, the letter becomes important evidence later: if the same issue recurs, the employer can rely on it to escalate to a final written warning or, in some cases, dismissal. Getting the wording accurate, proportionate, and consistent with your own disciplinary policy is therefore worth the time.
How to use this document
Deal with it informally first where possible. Not every conduct issue needs formal action. For minor or one-off problems, a quiet conversation or informal coaching is often the right response and the ACAS Code expects employers to consider this. Reserve the formal process for conduct that is more serious or that continues after informal intervention.
Investigate before you decide anything. Gather the facts before inviting the employee to a hearing. That may mean collecting emails, CCTV, witness statements, or timesheets, and speaking to anyone involved. The person investigating should, where practical, be different from the person who will chair the hearing. An inadequate investigation is one of the most common reasons disciplinary outcomes fall apart later.
Invite the employee to a disciplinary hearing in writing. The invitation should set out the alleged misconduct in enough detail for the employee to prepare a response, include any evidence you intend to rely on, confirm the possible outcomes, and remind the employee of their statutory right to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative. Give reasonable notice so they can prepare.
Hold the hearing and reach a measured decision. At the hearing, explain the concerns, let the employee put their side across, and consider any mitigation before deciding. Take proper notes. Do not pre-judge the outcome: a first written warning is only appropriate if, on balance, the misconduct is proven and a formal response is proportionate given the circumstances and the employee's record.
Issue the written warning and confirm appeal rights. Send the letter promptly after the hearing. It should identify the misconduct, the improvement required, how long the warning remains live (commonly six to twelve months, though this varies), what will happen if there is further misconduct, and how the employee can appeal. Keep a copy on the personnel file.
Q When is a first written warning the right response?
It tends to be appropriate where misconduct is established, is more than trivial, and an informal word or verbal warning has not resolved the issue, or the behaviour is serious enough to justify formal action from the outset. It is not usually the right step for gross misconduct, which can justify moving straight to a final written warning or dismissal. Your own disciplinary policy should set out the categories of behaviour that typically attract each level of sanction.
Q How long does a first written warning stay on the employee's record?
There is no fixed period in law. Most UK employers specify a live period in their disciplinary policy, often between six and twelve months, after which the warning is disregarded for disciplinary purposes. The letter should state clearly how long the warning remains active. After that period, it should not normally influence future disciplinary decisions, though the written record may still sit on file.
Q Does the employee have the right to be accompanied?
Yes. Under the Employment Relations Act 1999, workers have a statutory right to be accompanied at a formal disciplinary hearing by a colleague, a trade union representative, or a certified union official. The invitation letter should remind the employee of this right, and the hearing should be rearranged within a reasonable period if the chosen companion is not available at the original time.
Q Can the employee appeal a first written warning?
Yes, and the ACAS Code expects employers to offer a right of appeal against any formal disciplinary outcome. The warning letter should explain how to appeal, who to send the appeal to, and the time limit for doing so. Where possible, the appeal should be heard by a more senior manager who was not involved in the original decision, to keep the process fair and impartial.
Q What happens if the employee misconducts themselves again during the warning period?
If further misconduct occurs while the warning is live, the employer can usually escalate through the disciplinary process, for example to a final written warning, subject to a fresh investigation and hearing. The existing warning is part of the context, but the new allegation still needs to be properly investigated and the employee given a fair opportunity to respond before any further sanction is imposed.
Q What if we do not follow the ACAS Code properly?
The ACAS Code of Practice is not itself law, but employment tribunals take it into account. An unreasonable failure to follow it can lead to compensation in a successful unfair dismissal claim being adjusted upwards by up to 25 percent. Following the Code, keeping good records, and acting consistently with your own written policy all help reduce legal risk.
Q Should the warning letter mention the possibility of dismissal?
It is sensible to spell out, in neutral terms, that further misconduct during the live period of the warning could lead to more serious action, up to and including dismissal in line with the employer's disciplinary procedure. This helps the employee understand the significance of the warning and supports the fairness of any future escalation, provided that escalation is itself handled properly.
Disciplinary steps need to be fair, proportionate, and well documented, or a later dismissal can be picked apart at tribunal. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through the process based on what you describe about the situation on the call.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the disciplinary process
✓Practical perspective on where a first written warning fits based on what you describe
✓What to watch out for in your circumstances to stay aligned with the ACAS Code
✓Clarity on your next steps before you send the letter or hold the hearing
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.