Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
If you are considering a legal challenge to a planning decision in England or Wales, the Planning Court is almost certainly where your case will land. It sits within the King's Bench Division of the High Court and deals with the statutory challenges, judicial reviews and appeals that arise out of the planning system.
Because planning disputes can stall developments, affect communities and tie up public money, the court operates on a much tighter timetable than most other civil proceedings. On this page I walk through what the Planning Court actually does, the types of cases it handles, the forms typically used to bring a claim, and the deadlines you need to be aware of.
Planning litigation is technical and fast-moving, so the aim here is to give you a clear starting point rather than a substitute for proper guidance.
What this document is
The Planning Court is a specialist list within the King's Bench Division of the High Court, set up to deal with claims that raise significant planning issues. It is overseen by the Planning Liaison Judge and most substantive hearings take place at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, though cases can also be heard at regional High Court centres where appropriate.
The court was created to deliver quicker decisions on planning matters than the general Administrative Court list could offer, because delay in this area often has real commercial and public consequences. Its work covers judicial review of planning decisions taken by local authorities, the Secretary of State and inspectors, along with statutory challenges under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and related legislation.
The procedural framework sits in Civil Procedure Rules Part 54 and Practice Direction 54D, which set out how claims are issued, classified and progressed. Cases may be categorised as 'significant' when they raise particular urgency or wider public importance, triggering even shorter target timescales.
How to use this document
Identify the correct route of challenge. Before picking a form, work out whether your claim is a judicial review, a statutory challenge under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a section 289 appeal on a point of law, or some other route. Each has its own time limit and procedure, and choosing the wrong one can be fatal to the claim.
Prepare the claim form and supporting documents. Judicial review claims are usually issued using Form N461, which must be accompanied by a statement of facts and grounds, copies of the decision under challenge, and any relevant evidence. Statutory challenges have their own procedural requirements, and the court expects a properly pleaded case from the outset.
File within the strict time limit. Planning judicial reviews generally must be filed promptly and in any event within six weeks of the decision, which is shorter than the three-month limit that applies in most other judicial review contexts. Statutory challenges under section 288 also carry a six-week deadline that runs from the date of the decision.
Serve the claim on the defendant and interested parties. Once issued, the claim must be served on the decision-maker and any interested parties, typically the developer or objector whose interests are affected. Service rules and the documents that must accompany the claim are set out in the Civil Procedure Rules, and errors here can cause delay or cost consequences.
Engage with the court's timetable. The Planning Court aims to determine applications for permission within three weeks of the acknowledgment of service deadline, hear oral renewals within about a month, and list substantive hearings quickly where permission is granted. Parties should be ready to comply with directions promptly, as extensions are not easily given.
Q What kinds of cases does the Planning Court hear?
The court hears judicial reviews and statutory challenges connected to planning, including decisions on planning permission, enforcement notices, development consent orders, compulsory purchase, highways, rights of way, village greens and certain environmental matters. It also deals with section 288 and section 289 challenges under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and equivalent provisions in related planning legislation.
Q How long do I have to bring a planning judicial review?
Claims must be filed promptly and in any event within six weeks of the grounds for challenge first arising. This is shorter than the three-month period that applies to judicial review generally. Missing the deadline is usually fatal to the claim, so if you are considering a challenge it is sensible to take guidance early rather than wait.
Q Which form is used to start a judicial review in the Planning Court?
Judicial review claims are normally issued using Form N461, the judicial review claim form, together with a statement of facts and grounds and supporting documents. The court expects a fully pleaded case at the point of issue, not a skeleton to be developed later. Statutory challenges follow different procedural requirements depending on the statute relied on.
Q Where are Planning Court cases heard?
Most hearings take place at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, but the court can list cases at regional High Court centres such as Birmingham, Cardiff, Leeds, Manchester or Bristol where that is more convenient for the parties. The Planning Liaison Judge supervises the list and decisions about venue are made with the nature and location of the dispute in mind.
Q What does it mean for a case to be 'significant'?
Practice Direction 54D allows the court to classify a claim as a significant Planning Court claim where it raises issues of particular urgency or wider importance. Significant cases are placed on a faster target timetable, so permission decisions, oral renewals and substantive hearings are listed sooner. Parties can make representations about whether the classification should apply.
Q Do I need a lawyer to bring a Planning Court claim?
There is no absolute requirement to instruct a lawyer, but planning litigation is highly technical, time-critical and costly if it goes wrong. Adverse costs orders can be substantial. Most successful claimants are represented by planning counsel and solicitors with experience of the Planning Court. If budget is a concern, it is worth exploring early guidance before committing to litigation.
Q What happens if permission for judicial review is refused on the papers?
If a judge refuses permission on the papers, the claimant can usually request that the decision is reconsidered at an oral hearing, known as an oral renewal. The Planning Court aims to list oral renewals within about a month of the renewal request. If permission is refused again, the only further option is typically an application to the Court of Appeal.
Planning Court deadlines are short and the procedural rules are unforgiving, so it pays to think things through before you issue. An experienced legal adviser can talk you through your options based on what you describe and help you see where to focus first.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the Planning Court process
✓Practical perspective on timing and what the six-week deadline means for your situation
✓A clearer sense of which route of challenge fits what you describe
✓Help thinking through your next steps before you commit to litigation
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.