Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When commercial relationships span multiple countries, disputes become considerably more complex than a straightforward domestic disagreement. You might be a UK business owner dealing with a supplier in Germany who has failed to deliver, or perhaps a foreign company is threatening legal action against your London operation.
Either way, cross-border disputes throw up questions that purely domestic cases never face: which country's courts can hear the matter, whose laws apply, and if you do win, can the judgment actually be enforced against assets sitting abroad? This guide walks through the key legal concepts that shape international commercial disputes involving UK parties, from working out jurisdiction and choice of law through to the practical realities of enforcement and the role alternative dispute resolution can play. Understanding these fundamentals early on can save considerable time, money, and stress later.
What this document is
An international business dispute arises whenever a commercial disagreement crosses national borders, whether through the location of the parties, the place where the contract was performed, where the loss occurred, or where the relevant assets sit. Typical examples include contractual breaches between parties in different countries, supply chain failures, shareholder disputes in multinational groups, cross-border debt recovery, disputes over international distribution or agency arrangements, and conflicts over intellectual property use abroad.
What makes these disputes distinct is the layering of legal systems. A single case can potentially involve the courts and laws of two or more countries, international treaties, and specialist rules governing how foreign judgments travel across borders. Since the UK's departure from the EU, some of the reciprocal arrangements that once simplified matters within Europe no longer apply in the same way, and parties now need to think carefully about which framework governs their situation.
Getting clarity on jurisdiction and governing law at the contract stage, rather than after things go wrong, usually makes a significant difference.
How to use this document
Work out which courts have jurisdiction. Before anything else, identify which country's courts are entitled to hear the dispute. Factors include where the defendant is based, whether there is an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the contract, where the contract was performed, and where any wrongdoing took place. UK courts may accept jurisdiction in a range of scenarios, but this is fact-specific.
Identify the governing law. The law applied to the substance of the dispute is often separate from the question of which court hears it. A well-drafted contract will include a governing law clause. Without one, the court will apply conflict-of-laws rules to determine which country's law is most closely connected to the matter, which can produce unexpected results.
Consider whether ADR fits the situation. Litigation across borders is expensive and slow. Arbitration, mediation, and expert determination can often resolve international commercial disputes more efficiently, and arbitration awards are generally easier to enforce internationally than court judgments thanks to the New York Convention.
Plan for enforcement from the outset. A judgment or award is only useful if you can actually collect. Research where the other party holds assets, whether that country recognises UK judgments, and what treaties or reciprocal arrangements apply. Enforcement strategy should influence where and how you bring the claim.
Get the right legal support early. International disputes reward preparation. Gather contracts, correspondence, invoices, and evidence of loss before taking formal steps. A solicitor experienced in cross-border work can help you weigh forum options, preserve evidence, and avoid procedural missteps that could undermine the claim.
Sometimes, yes. UK courts may accept jurisdiction if the defendant is based here, has agreed to UK jurisdiction in a contract, if the contract was to be performed in the UK, or if a tort occurred on UK soil. Permission from the court is often required to serve proceedings outside the jurisdiction, so the factual basis matters.
Q What happens if my contract does not specify a governing law?
Where the parties have not chosen a governing law, the court deciding the case will apply conflict-of-laws rules to identify the legal system most closely connected with the dispute. This typically considers factors like where the contract was performed, where the parties are based, and the nature of the obligations involved. The outcome is not always predictable.
Q Is arbitration better than litigation for international disputes?
It often is, for three main reasons. Arbitration is usually confidential, the parties can pick arbitrators with relevant commercial experience, and awards are enforceable in over 170 countries under the New York Convention. Litigation judgments, by contrast, depend on bilateral or multilateral arrangements that may not exist between the relevant countries.
Q How has Brexit affected UK cross-border disputes?
The UK is no longer part of the EU regime that automatically governed jurisdiction and enforcement between member states. Parties now rely more heavily on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, domestic common law rules, and individual treaties. The practical effect is that enforcement of UK judgments in EU countries can be more complex than it used to be.
Q Can a UK judgment be enforced abroad?
It can, but the route depends on the destination country. Some countries have treaties or reciprocal arrangements with the UK that streamline recognition, while others require the claimant to bring fresh proceedings on the UK judgment. It pays to investigate enforceability before committing to litigation, particularly if the defendant's assets are outside the UK.
Q Should I include a jurisdiction clause in my international contracts?
Almost always, yes. A clear jurisdiction clause tells both sides which courts will hear any dispute, which removes a major source of argument if things go wrong. Pairing it with a governing law clause gives even more certainty. For high-value or ongoing relationships, an arbitration clause may be worth considering instead.
Q How long do international commercial disputes usually take?
There is no single answer. A mediated settlement can be reached in weeks, arbitration may take a year or two, and full cross-border litigation can run for several years, especially if there are jurisdictional challenges or enforcement complications. Early legal input often shortens the timeline by focusing the case on the strongest arguments.
International commercial disputes throw up questions about jurisdiction, governing law, and enforcement that rarely have obvious answers. An experienced legal adviser can talk through the key issues with you based on what you describe and help you think through your options.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the dispute
✓Practical perspective on jurisdiction and governing law in your situation
✓Help thinking through whether litigation, arbitration, or mediation fits best
✓Clarity on what to consider before taking your next step
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.