Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When a company runs out of money, disputes tend to follow. Creditors want paying, office-holders want to trace missing value, and directors often find themselves personally in the firing line. Insolvency litigation is the umbrella term for the court claims that sort all of this out, and it sits at a messy intersection of company law, insolvency law and ordinary civil procedure.
This page walks through the main types of claims you are likely to encounter in England and Wales, who tends to bring them, and what the process looks like from start to finish. Whether you are a director worried about personal exposure, a creditor chasing a debt, or a shareholder trying to understand what a liquidator is doing, the goal here is to give you a clear picture of the landscape before you spend money on professional help.
Overview
Insolvency litigation covers any court proceedings that arise because a company (or sometimes an individual) cannot pay its debts as they fall due. The claims break down into a few broad categories. Office-holder claims are brought by a liquidator or administrator to recover value for the estate, for example by reversing transactions made at an undervalue or unwinding preferences given to favoured creditors.
Director claims target those who ran the company, and can range from breach of duty through to wrongful or fraudulent trading. Creditor claims run alongside these, with creditors pursuing debts, challenging security, or objecting to how an office-holder is distributing funds.
There is also a layer of procedural litigation around the insolvency process itself: disputed statutory demands, challenges to winding-up petitions, applications to set aside bankruptcy orders, and arguments over the validity of appointments. The common thread is that the company's financial failure has created a pot of disputes that the courts have to resolve, often under tight statutory rules found in the Insolvency Act 1986 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.
Key steps
Work out who has standing to bring the claim. Not every interested party can sue. Office-holder claims such as wrongful trading, preferences and transactions at an undervalue can usually only be brought by the liquidator or administrator. Creditors generally act in their own name for straightforward debts, but may need to seek permission from the court or the office-holder before pursuing claims that sit within the insolvent estate.
Gather the evidence early. Insolvency cases live or die on documents: board minutes, management accounts, bank statements, cash flow forecasts, emails between directors, and the statement of affairs filed at the start of the insolvency. Reconstructing the company's financial position at key dates is often the central battleground, so securing records before they disappear is a priority. Forensic accountants are frequently instructed.
Issue the correct application or claim form. Most insolvency-related claims are brought by insolvency application under the 2016 Rules rather than by ordinary Part 7 claim form, and they are usually heard in the Insolvency and Companies Court or the relevant District Registry. Getting the procedural route wrong can cause delay and cost, so the drafting of the application and supporting witness statement matters from day one.
Engage with directions, disclosure and expert evidence. The court will set a timetable covering disclosure of documents, exchange of witness statements and any expert reports (typically from accountants on solvency, valuation or quantum). This is often the longest phase of the case. Settlement discussions and mediation frequently happen during this window, and most insolvency disputes resolve before trial.
Trial, judgment and enforcement. If the case does not settle, it proceeds to a trial where the judge hears live evidence and submissions. A successful office-holder claim against a director typically results in a personal monetary order, which then has to be enforced against the director's assets. Enforcement can involve charging orders over property, third party debt orders or, in some cases, bankruptcy proceedings against the defendant personally.
Wrongful trading under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986 applies where a director kept trading after the point at which they knew, or should have concluded, that there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation or administration. If the claim succeeds, the court can order the director to contribute personally to the company's assets. The defence turns on showing the director took every step a reasonably diligent person would have taken to minimise loss to creditors.
Q How is fraudulent trading different?
Fraudulent trading under section 213 requires proof that the business was carried on with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose. The bar is much higher than wrongful trading because actual dishonesty has to be established. It can also carry criminal consequences under separate Companies Act provisions. Because of the evidential difficulty, office-holders often plead wrongful trading and breach of duty alongside, or instead of, fraudulent trading.
Q What is a preference claim?
A preference arises when an insolvent company does something that puts a creditor, surety or guarantor in a better position than they would have been in on a liquidation, and the company was influenced by a desire to produce that effect. The relevant look-back period is generally six months, extended to two years for connected parties. If proved, the court can unwind the transaction and order repayment, restoring the position for the wider body of creditors.
Q Can directors be sued personally even if the company was limited?
Yes. Limited liability protects shareholders from the company's debts, but it does not shield directors from personal claims based on their own conduct. Wrongful trading, misfeasance, breach of fiduciary duty, personal guarantees and certain tax liabilities can all pierce that protection. Directors facing an insolvency often underestimate this exposure, which is why taking early advice once cash flow gets tight is sensible.
Q How long does insolvency litigation usually take?
It varies widely. A straightforward preference claim that settles early might conclude within a few months. Contested misfeasance or wrongful trading claims involving disputed expert evidence can run for two years or more from issue to trial. Funding arrangements, the complexity of the company's records, and the number of defendants all affect timing. Many claims settle at or shortly before mediation rather than going the distance to trial.
Q Who pays for office-holder litigation?
Liquidators and administrators often struggle to fund claims from the estate itself because there is no cash. In practice, funding typically comes from creditor contributions, third party litigation funders, after-the-event insurance, or conditional fee agreements with solicitors. Since 2016, the proceeds of most office-holder claims can also be assigned to a funder or creditor, which has opened up the market considerably.
Q Is insolvency litigation worth pursuing?
The honest answer is that it depends on the strength of the case and, critically, whether the defendant has assets worth chasing. A cast-iron claim against a director with no equity in their home and no other realisable assets may not be economic to pursue. A weaker claim against a well-resourced defendant sometimes is. Proper pre-action analysis of both merits and recovery prospects is essential before issuing.
Facing an insolvency dispute and not sure where you stand?
Insolvency claims move quickly and the stakes, especially for directors, can be high. An experienced legal adviser can help you think through the issues on a call, focused on your specific situation based on what you describe.
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about the claim or threat you are facing
✓Practical perspective on what the main insolvency claims mean for your circumstances
✓Help thinking through your options and what to watch out for in your case
✓Clarity on when it may be time to instruct a specialist insolvency solicitor
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.