Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice.
Updated June 2026 · England & Wales
When a solicitor, accountant, surveyor, financial adviser or other professional falls below the standard expected of them, you may have a right to claim for the losses that follow. Missing the deadline, however, usually ends the claim before it begins.
The rules on timing are set out in the Limitation Act 1980, and they can be surprisingly tricky to apply, particularly where the harm only becomes apparent years after the original mistake. On this page I walk through how the main limitation periods work for professional negligence in England and Wales, the exceptions that can extend or shorten your window, and the practical steps you can take if you think you may have a claim. I have written it for anyone considering whether it is worth taking things further.
Overview
Professional negligence is where someone offering a professional service fails to meet the standard a reasonably competent member of that profession would have met, and their failure causes you a financial loss. It might be a solicitor who misses a filing date, an accountant who gives poor tax guidance, a surveyor who overlooks a significant defect, or a financial adviser who puts a client into an unsuitable investment.
To bring a claim, you generally need to show three things: that the professional owed you a duty of care, that they breached it, and that the breach caused quantifiable loss. Timing is the fourth hurdle and often the hardest.
English law sets a ceiling on how long after the event you can issue proceedings, and once that period passes the court will usually strike out the claim regardless of how strong it might otherwise have been. Understanding which clock applies to your situation, and when it started running, is therefore the first thing to work out.
Key steps
Identify the date the loss occurred. The six-year clock for a claim in tort typically starts running when you first suffered measurable financial damage, which is not always the same day as the mistake. Pinning down this date is crucial because it anchors every other calculation and will be the first thing any adviser or lawyer looks at.
Consider whether the claim is in contract, tort, or both. Many professional relationships involve a contract, and a breach of contract claim starts running from the date of the breach itself, which can differ from when the loss crystallised. Running both causes of action in parallel can sometimes give you a longer effective window, so it is worth working out which applies.
Check the discovery rule under section 14A. If you genuinely could not have known about the negligence or the loss at the time, section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 may give you three additional years from the date you had the knowledge needed to investigate. You need to be able to evidence when you first had enough information to reasonably suspect something had gone wrong.
Mind the 15-year longstop. Section 14B imposes an absolute cut-off of 15 years from the act or omission, regardless of when you discovered the problem. This is a hard deadline with very limited exceptions, so even latent issues need to be raised before this outer boundary closes.
Preserve evidence and get guidance early. Gather your engagement letters, correspondence, invoices, file notes and anything showing what was agreed and when things went wrong. The earlier you act, the more options you typically have, including negotiating before issuing proceedings or agreeing a standstill to pause the clock while matters are explored.
Q How long do I have to bring a professional negligence claim?
In most cases you have six years from the date the cause of action accrued, meaning the date you first suffered a financial loss as a result of the negligence. If you only discovered the problem later, you may have an extra three years from that point of knowledge, subject to a final 15-year longstop. The exact window depends on the facts, so it is worth checking your specific situation rather than assuming.
Q When does the six-year limitation period actually start?
For a claim in tort, it starts when you first suffered measurable loss, which can be later than the original mistake. For a contract claim, it generally starts on the date of the breach itself. Working out the correct trigger date is often the most contested part of a professional negligence dispute, and small differences can decide whether a claim is in time.
Q What is the discovery rule and when does it help?
Section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 gives you three years from the date you knew, or reasonably should have known, the key facts needed to bring a claim. It is designed for situations where the damage was hidden for a period, such as a defective piece of advice that only surfaces years later. You need to be able to show when that knowledge was first reasonably available to you.
Q Can I still claim after 15 years?
Usually not. The 15-year longstop in section 14B sets an absolute outer limit from the date of the negligent act or omission, and after it expires the claim is generally barred even if you only just discovered the problem. There are very narrow exceptions, for example involving deliberate concealment, so if you think one might apply, take guidance before assuming the door is fully closed.
Q Does sending a letter of claim stop the clock?
No. Only issuing court proceedings, or agreeing a formal standstill with the other side, will stop the limitation period running. Pre-action correspondence under the Professional Negligence Pre-Action Protocol is important, but it does not by itself pause time. If a deadline is approaching, a protective issue of proceedings or a written standstill agreement is normally the safest option.
Q What if the professional tried to hide the mistake?
Where there has been deliberate concealment of relevant facts, section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 can postpone the start of the limitation period until you discovered, or could reasonably have discovered, the concealment. This is a fact-specific argument and the threshold is high, so you would need clear evidence that the professional knew of the issue and chose not to disclose it.
Q Should I use the Pre-Action Protocol before issuing?
For most professional negligence claims the court expects the parties to follow the Professional Negligence Pre-Action Protocol, which sets out letters of claim, responses and timescales designed to encourage early settlement. Following it properly can reduce costs and improve outcomes, but it does not extend limitation, so timing must be managed alongside the protocol steps.
Limitation in professional negligence turns on specific dates that are easy to misread, and getting the trigger wrong can cost you the claim entirely. An experienced legal adviser can talk you through how the rules apply based on what you describe and help you think through your next move.
✓A clear explanation of how the six-year, three-year and 15-year windows might apply to what you describe
✓Plain-English answers to your specific questions about when the clock started
✓Practical perspective on whether a standstill agreement or early issue might protect your position
✓Help you think through what evidence to gather and who to speak to next
Personal call · For information only · Independent advisers
Written & reviewed by
Brad Askew Solicitor (non-practising)
Brad is on the roll of solicitors of England & Wales but does not hold a practising certificate and does not provide legal advice. LegalDocuments.co.uk is not a law firm and does not provide regulated legal advice.
This article is for general information only. It is a tool to help you find your way — not legal advice, and not a substitute for speaking to a qualified adviser about your situation.